Re: SEQ frames and MIME entity headers
Jered Floyd <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.ietf.beep |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
> That's true, but it doesn't have to. Applications that depend on that > feature can define mechanisms in their profiles for doing that. The > core profiles don't have any such mechanism, but then-- they don't > need to send pathologically long entity headers, do they? Applications can only define mechanisms in their profiles only if their profiles are tied to only operate over a TCP transport. This seems poor. The core profiles don't need to send 'pathologically' long entity headers, but they *could*, and changing the standard in such a way where the 'proper' behaviour can only be defined as 'deadlock' is inappropriate. It's reasonable to disallow certain operations, but only if failure can be indicated meaningfully. --Jered