Re: pipelining within channel 0
james woodyatt <[email protected]> Tue, 11 May 2004 21:34:53 -0700
| Newsgroups | gmane.ietf.beep |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On 11 May 2004, at 15:21, Marshall Rose wrote: > > a related ambiguity is how to handle a simultaneous close on channel > zero! Here's how that works in my implementation: if you have sent a <close/> and not yet received a reply/error, then you respond to a <close/> by sending an <error code='450'> in response. If you receive an <error code='450'> in response to a <close/> you've sent, and you've responded to a <close/> with an <error code='450'> then you retry the <close/> if you're the peer in the initiator role. -- j h woodyatt <[email protected]>