RE: Soap Over Beep Question

Hi!

Thank you all for your inputs on the question. 
Eamon has very clearly stated the intent/meaning of 
that line and I am clear about it now.

There is one request I have. Would you guys care to reply 
to my second email. Starting from the first day I read
SOAP Over BEEP, I had this question in mind that why there
are no tags for message patterns, since in my openion they
would have made life alots easier for people using SOAP Over
BEEP. I would feel complete about the discussion if you guys
could give me some hints on why this was not done.

Thanks One Again! And looking forward to some more insights
on SOAP Over BEEP.

regards,
Rohit Karlupia 




-----Original Message-----
From: [email protected]
[mailto:[email protected]]On Behalf Of Gabe Wachob
Sent: Sunday, June 30, 2002 2:39 AM
To: Eamon O'Tuathail
Cc: [email protected]; [email protected];
[email protected]
Subject: RE: [BEEPwg] Soap Over Beep Question


Thanks for the clarification.

I think we were reading that one sentence too literally.

These back and forth discussions serve a useful purpose because even
though the RFC is finalized, these archives will hopefully prevent repeat
questions. I just hope the archives stay up relatively permanently.

	-Gabe

On Sat, 29 Jun 2002, Eamon O'Tuathail wrote:

http://lists.beepcore.org/mailman/listinfo/beepwg