Channel response serialization
"Paul Andrews" <[email protected]> Wed, 24 Jul 2002 16:37:07 -0400
| Newsgroups | gmane.ietf.beep |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
I'm curious about the justification for the requirement that responses to queries on a channel be in the same order in which the queries were issued. I understand that it has been stated that this simplifies the protocol implementation. Does this mean that it simplifies the protocol or the libraries that implement it? If its just the libraries, couldn't the serialization requirement be made optional (i.e. part of the session negotiation)? I ask because it seems that this excludes a large class of applications from using BEEP, so that those of us who need truly asynchronous messaging are left with the same problem that BEEP was intended to solve. Namely: HTTP doesn't quite fit and SMTP doesn't quite fit. Now BEEP doesn't quite fit either :-(