Re: Channel response serialization

> OK. I don't want to rat-hole on this so: do I understand correctly that
you
> are proposing to amend the RFC to make serialization on a channel
optional?

no. what i'm proposing is that we use beep's extension mechanism (called
"features") and write a new document that talks defines a feature that
removes the same-order property. rfc3080 doesn't change. presumably a new
rfc gets published that describes how something implementing rfc3080 can
also say that it does the new thing too.

/mtr