Re: Channel response serialization

Would it be possible to use this beep extension mechanism
to negotiate the ability to send one-way messages (messages
that do not have any replies)?

Greg  [new to beep...]


> 
> > OK. I don't want to rat-hole on this so: do I understand correctly that
> you
> > are proposing to amend the RFC to make serialization on a channel
> optional?
> 
> no. what i'm proposing is that we use beep's extension mechanism (called
> "features") and write a new document that talks defines a feature that
> removes the same-order property. rfc3080 doesn't change. presumably a new
> rfc gets published that describes how something implementing rfc3080 can
> also say that it does the new thing too.
> 
> /mtr
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> BEEPwg mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://lists.beepcore.org/mailman/listinfo/beepwg
>