Re: interoperability list

I would rather see the beepwg list be the place that newcomers and users
are attracted to (because its linked up at the IETF, for example) - and I
wouldn't want to see a lot of (what I would expect to be) low level
discussion discourage higher level discussions.

Also, users don't really care about details of interoperability besides at
a functional level, so I'd hate to force people off this list who are here
*because* it is low volume.

	-Gabe

On Tue, 20 Aug 2002, Eamon O'Tuathail wrote:

>
> >> is there general agreement on splitting off interoperability
> >> issues to a new list?
>
> Considering there is not too much traffic on the "normal" beep mailing
> list, would it not be better to keep the interop discussion right here,
> and have just one beep mailing list.
>
> Eamon
>
> _______________________________________________
> BEEPwg mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://lists.beepcore.org/mailman/listinfo/beepwg
>

-- 
Gabe Wachob                       [email protected]
Personal                       http://www.wachob.com
Founder, WiredObjects    http://www.wiredobjects.com