Re: transformative content-transfer-encoding in core profiles
Marshall Rose <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.ietf.beep |
|---|---|
| Organization | Dover Beach Consulting, Inc. |
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
> everyone-- > > What should a BEEP peer do when it receives an initial greeting message > in a transformative content transfer encoding? > > For example: > > RPY 0 0 . 0 nnn > Content-Type: application/beep+xml; charset="iso-8859-1" > Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable > > <greeting/> > END > > RFC 3080 seems to be silent on the subject. > > If the IETF ever revises the BEEP core specification, is it possible we > might see an outright ban on the use of the Content-Transfer-Encoding > entity header in all of the core profiles? At least a strong > recommendation against? hmmm... i don't think that seeing a CTE on channel zero is any different than seeing a CTE on any other channel. it's just wrong. each channel is supposed to be 8-bit clean. can anyone come up with a reason as to why a CTE is needed? if not, then i think this falls under the category of "being liberal in what you accept"...if an implementation treated it as a fatal error, i wouldn't complain about that... /mtr