Re: transformative content-transfer-encoding in core profiles

Marshall Rose <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.ietf.beep
Organization Dover Beach Consulting, Inc.
Message-ID <[email protected]>
> everyone--
> 
> What should a BEEP peer do when it receives an initial greeting message 
> in a transformative content transfer encoding?
> 
> For example:
> 
> 	RPY 0 0 . 0 nnn
> 	Content-Type: application/beep+xml; charset="iso-8859-1"
> 	Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
> 
> 	<greeting/>
> 	END
> 
> RFC 3080 seems to be silent on the subject.
> 
> If the IETF ever revises the BEEP core specification, is it possible we 
> might see an outright ban on the use of the Content-Transfer-Encoding 
> entity header in all of the core profiles?  At least a strong 
> recommendation against?

hmmm... i don't think that seeing a CTE on channel zero is any different than seeing a CTE on any other channel. it's just wrong. each channel is supposed to be 8-bit clean. can anyone come up with a reason as to why a CTE is needed?

if not, then i think this falls under the category of "being liberal in what you accept"...if an implementation treated it as a fatal error, i wouldn't complain about that...

/mtr
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.