Re: WG adoption: Traffic Management Draft
"Jacob Rapp (jarapp)" <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.ietf.bmwg |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
I support this draft. It is important to get traffic-management benchmarking consistent. I have read 01 and have some more comments as well: Main comment: For congestion management(6.4.1) tests there should be some considerations for marking (ECN) vs. a dropping. -- Jacob From: Sarah Banks <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> Date: Monday, April 29, 2013 11:25 PM To: "[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>" <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> Subject: [bmwg] WG adoption: Traffic Management Draft Hello BMWG, With discussion at the previous IETF-86 session, we're now asking the BMWG mailing list for reviews, comments and indication of support for the following draft: Traffic Management Benchmarking http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-constantine-bmwg-traffic-management-01 Co-author Barry Constantine sent an email to the BMWG list on April 19th, when he submitted the aforementioned -01 revision of the draft, with great notes describing the update: http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/bmwg/current/msg02758.html Please read the draft and provide opinions on whether BMWG should adopt it as a chartered work item, by May 20th, 2013<x-apple-data-detectors://3>. As always, please send all comments to the bmwg-list. Thanks, Sarah BMWG co-chair _______________________________________________ bmwg mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/bmwg