Re: draft-cerveny-bmwg-ipv6-nd-02
joel jaeggli <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.ietf.bmwg |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On 11/18/13, 4:33 AM, Bill Cerveny wrote: > Hi Nalini, > > See comments below: > > On Nov 14, 2013, at 8:50 AM, Nalini Elkins > <[email protected] > <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: > >> Bill, >> >> As I commented at the BMWG meeting, IMHO a few things would be quite >> valuable to benchmark for IPv6. I do not know if these are in scope >> of the charter. We can certainly discuss further, if desired. >> >> 1. The impact of extension headers on performance >> There has been quite a bit of discussion in v6ops and 6man about >> "long" extension headers and ASIC size. That is, if the header gets >> too big, then it is routed slowly. I, for one, would like to see >> some kind of formal discussion and benchmarking of this. > > See http://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc5180#section-5.3, "IPv6 Benchmarking > Methodology", section "Traffic with Extension Headers". There may be > value in a more in-depth discussion and benchmarking of extension > headers and its impact on routers / intermediate nodes. It's a probably mistaken generalization to assume there's a recourse to a "slow path". In many platforms it's perfectly reasonable to expect fast-path or no-path. >> >> 2. Router advertisements: >> Much "bad" stuff can be done with Router Advertisements. See >> UTube video: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TfsfNWHCKK0 >> I believe he got this from : https://www.thc.org/thc-ipv6/ which >> also has: > > This was an interesting attack. I had replicated the behavior described > in the YouTube video with Windows 7 and Windows 8 in VMs using > flood_router6 in Nov. 2012. Sam Bowne had done a bit of research on this > issue, including characterizing the behavior on multiple systems as well > as confirming that Microsoft had mostly fixed the problem with patches > in 2013. > > A distinction with the flood_router6 Windows attack is that it didn't > attack routers (intermediate nodes), as far as I know, and the attack > could "only" be launched from the same "broadcast domain." > > Bill >> - parasite6: icmp neighbor solitication/advertisement spoofer, puts you as man-in-the-middle, same >> as ARP mitm (and parasite) >> - alive6: an effective alive scanng, which will detect all systems listening to this address >> - dnsdict6: parallized dns ipv6 dictionary bruteforcer >> - fake_router6: announce yourself as a router on the network, with the highest priority >> - redir6: redirect traffic to you intelligently (man-in-the-middle) with a clever icmp6 redirect spoofer >> - toobig6: mtu decreaser with the same intelligence as redir6 >> - detect-new-ip6: detect new ip6 devices which join the network, you can run a script to automatically scan these systems etc. >> - dos-new-ip6: detect new ip6 devices and tell them that their chosen IP collides on the network (DOS). >> - trace6: very fast traceroute6 with supports ICMP6 echo request and TCP-SYN >> - flood_router6: flood a target with random router advertisements >> - flood_advertise6: flood a target with random neighbor advertisements >> - exploit6: known ipv6 vulnerabilities to test against a target >> - denial6: a collection of denial-of-service tests againsts a target >> - fuzz_ip6: fuzzer for ipv6 >> - implementation6: performs various implementation checks on ipv6 >> - implementation6d: listen daemon for implementation6 to check behind a fw >> - fake_mld6: announce yourself in a multicast group of your choice on the net >> - fake_mld26: same but for MLDv2 >> - fake_mldrouter6: fake MLD router messages >> - fake_mipv6: steal a mobile IP to yours if IPSEC is not needed for authentication >> - fake_advertiser6: announce yourself on the network >> - smurf6: local smurfer >> - rsmurf6: remote smurfer, known to work only against linux at the moment >> - sendpees6: a tool by willdamn(ad)gmail.com <http://gmail.com>, which generates a neighbor solicitation requests with a lot of CGAs (crypto stuff ;-) to keep the CPU busy. nice. >> - thcping6: sends a hand crafted ping6 packet >> >> >> Thanks, >> >> Nalini Elkins >> Inside Products, Inc. >> (831) 659-8360 >> www.insidethestack.com <http://www.insidethestack.com> >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> bmwg mailing list >> [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> >> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/bmwg > > > > _______________________________________________ > bmwg mailing list > [email protected] > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/bmwg > _______________________________________________ bmwg mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/bmwg
signature.asc
(application/pgp-signature, 308 B)
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG/MacGPG2 v2.0.22 (Darwin) Comment: GPGTools - http://gpgtools.org Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://www.enigmail.net/ iEYEARECAAYFAlKMYR4ACgkQ8AA1q7Z/VrIXNACgiU1UScqqAm6uD2ECmoTPbkE5 vqIAn0VxytbCKTX7HXNVEb4cFqG+wBXO =rrPR -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----