Comments on draft-ietf-bmwg-bgp-basic-convergence-01.txt
"Fernando Calabria (fcalabri)" <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.ietf.bmwg |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <CF48BF6D.127DA%[email protected]> |
Hi there, I hope everyone is doing ok and you had a good productive time
@ London Š
After reading the doc, I find the methodology as well as the overall Test
Coverage very well laid out.
I personally see some room for further improvement / expansion in some of
the specific procedures, for example:
5.1.1 RIB-IN Convergence.. Step ³F²
Record the time when the route A from Peer-x is received at
the DUT.
The authors may want to expand here and described how Œexactly¹ the tester
can measure this specific time.
I would expect that it is not by relying in any sort of Œdebugs¹ / logs ,
nor for a single prefix and even worst for the case of multiple ones.
A suggestion would be to have a ³TAP² or a Sniffer and make note of the
exact time the UPDATE carrying the corresponding NLRI makes it to the
³wire²
This comment also applies to 5.1.2 point ³I² and to other Test Cases as
well.
Rgds
Fernando