Re: In Service Software Upgrade Draft
"MORTON, ALFRED C (AL)" <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.ietf.bmwg |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <2845723087023D4CB5114223779FA9C80189AAD6E9@njfpsrvexg8.research.att.com> |
So you're saying that some of the internal state (counters, statistics) may not be maintained across the up-grade? That's something to note in the report, IMO. Al > -----Original Message----- > From: Fernando Calabria (fcalabri) [mailto:[email protected]] > Sent: Tuesday, July 08, 2014 8:28 AM > To: MORTON, ALFRED C (AL); Banks, Sarah; [email protected] > Subject: Re: [bmwg] In Service Software Upgrade Draft > > The point we were discussing was the fact that some implementations will > reset the session timers / statistics. While the ISSU process may / should > not affect the control and forwarding plane, in some implementations the > timers for the session up-time and other statistics are reset . Should > we address this as part of the Exit criteria for an ISSU process ? > > > Rgds > > > Fernando > > > > On 7/8/14, 8:16 AM, "MORTON, ALFRED C (AL)" <[email protected]> wrote: > > >> -----Original Message----- > >> From: bmwg [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Banks, Sarah > >... > >> The ISSU draft is in a pretty solid state, from the authors point of > >> view. We wanted to solicit a bit of feedback, and make sure we've > >>covered > >> all bases. There was some discussion around the authors as to adding > >>some > >> text around timers and counters in the draft - do you trust the DUT? > >> Should you confirm these outside of the DUT? Etc. Thoughts? > >> > >> Kind regards, > >> Sarah & Fernando & Gery > >> > > > >I gave this topic some thought last week: > > > >http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-morton-bmwg-virtual-net-01#section-4.2 > > > > ... external observations remain essential as the > > basis for Benchmarks. Internal observations with fixed specification > > and interpretation may be provided in parallel, to assist the > > development of operations procedures when the technology is deployed, > > for example. Internal metrics and measurements from Open Source > > implementations may be the only direct source of performance results > > in a desired dimension, but corroborating external observations are > > still required to assure the integrity of measurement discipline was > > maintained for all reported results. > > > >This text is new and isn't agreed yet, it's my thoughts on the topic. > >Al > >(as a participant) > > > >_______________________________________________ > >bmwg mailing list > >[email protected] > >https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/bmwg