Re: In Service Software Upgrade Draft

"MORTON, ALFRED C (AL)" <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.ietf.bmwg
Message-ID <2845723087023D4CB5114223779FA9C80189AAD6E9@njfpsrvexg8.research.att.com>
So you're saying that some of the internal state
(counters, statistics) may not be maintained across 
the up-grade?

That's something to note in the report, IMO.
Al

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Fernando Calabria (fcalabri) [mailto:[email protected]]
> Sent: Tuesday, July 08, 2014 8:28 AM
> To: MORTON, ALFRED C (AL); Banks, Sarah; [email protected]
> Subject: Re: [bmwg] In Service Software Upgrade Draft
> 
> The point we were discussing was the fact that some implementations will
> reset the session timers / statistics. While the ISSU process may / should
> not affect the control and forwarding plane, in  some implementations the
> timers for the session up-time and other statistics   are reset . Should
> we address this as part of the Exit criteria for an ISSU process ?
> 
> 
> Rgds
> 
> 
> Fernando
> 
> 
> 
> On 7/8/14, 8:16 AM, "MORTON, ALFRED C (AL)" <[email protected]> wrote:
> 
> >> -----Original Message-----
> >> From: bmwg [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Banks, Sarah
> >...
> >> 	The ISSU draft is in a pretty solid state, from the authors point of
> >> view. We wanted to solicit a bit of feedback, and make sure we've
> >>covered
> >> all bases. There was some discussion around the authors as to adding
> >>some
> >> text around timers and counters in the draft - do you trust the DUT?
> >> Should you confirm these outside of the DUT? Etc. Thoughts?
> >>
> >> Kind regards,
> >> Sarah & Fernando & Gery
> >>
> >
> >I gave this topic some thought last week:
> >
> >http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-morton-bmwg-virtual-net-01#section-4.2
> >
> >   ... external observations remain essential as the
> >   basis for Benchmarks.  Internal observations with fixed specification
> >   and interpretation may be provided in parallel, to assist the
> >   development of operations procedures when the technology is deployed,
> >   for example.  Internal metrics and measurements from Open Source
> >   implementations may be the only direct source of performance results
> >   in a desired dimension, but corroborating external observations are
> >   still required to assure the integrity of measurement discipline was
> >   maintained for all reported results.
> >
> >This text is new and isn't agreed yet, it's my thoughts on the topic.
> >Al
> >(as a participant)
> >
> >_______________________________________________
> >bmwg mailing list
> >[email protected]
> >https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/bmwg
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.