Re: Second WGLC on draft-ietf-bmwg-traffic-management
Barry Constantine <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.ietf.bmwg |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Hi Al, Concerning the several comments in the area of Measurement units, I am unsure what is intended for some of these. One example below: - Shaper Rate (SR): the Shaper Rate is only applicable to the traffic shaping tests. The SR represents the average egress output rate (bps) over the test interval. ACM] determine and add: Measurement Units for reported values. In this example, the SR is bps, so sorry I must be missing something obvious concerning your request. Thanks, Barry ________________________________________ From: bmwg [[email protected]] on behalf of MORTON, ALFRED C (AL) [[email protected]] Sent: Monday, January 05, 2015 2:10 PM To: [email protected]; [email protected] Subject: Re: [bmwg] Second WGLC on draft-ietf-bmwg-traffic-management BMWG -FYI this WGLC ends tomorrow. Hi Barry and Ramki, These are my comments on Traffic Management Benchmarking draft-ietf-bmwg-traffic-management-01.txt Al (as participant) Note: as Document Shepherd, I see quite a few nits generated by the nits-checker: https://tools.ietf.org/idnits?url=https://tools.ietf.org/id/draft-ietf-bmwg-traffic-management-01.txt High-level: 7. Security Considerations 8. IANA Considerations 9. Conclusions Security and IANA sections are Mandatory, and cannot be blank. I saw a few "TBD" in section 6, questions for Ramki. . . The new procedures add considerable needed details, but also raise a few questions. When considering repeatability over multiple test runs, there could be a statistical measure of deviation for the key benchmarks so that the audience can easily assess the degree of consistency observed. Detailed comments on a partial version of the draft are attached. ________________________________________ From: bmwg [[email protected]] On Behalf Of MORTON, ALFRED C (AL) Sent: Wednesday, December 10, 2014 2:30 PM To: [email protected]; [email protected] Subject: [bmwg] Second WGLC on draft-ietf-bmwg-traffic-management BMWG (and AQM): A WG Last Call period for the Internet-Draft on Traffic Management Benchmarking: http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-bmwg-traffic-management will be open from 10 December 2014 through 6 January, 2015. The first WGLC (on -00) closed October 21 2014, with substantial comments and the authors believe they are now addressed. This draft is continuing the BMWG Last Call Process. See http://www1.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/bmwg/current/msg00846.html Please read and express your opinion on whether or not this Internet-Draft should be forwarded to the Area Directors for publication as an Informational RFC. Send your comments to this list or [email protected] and [email protected] Al bmwg co-chair _______________________________________________ bmwg mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/bmwg