Re: Second WGLC on draft-ietf-bmwg-traffic-management

Barry Constantine <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.ietf.bmwg
Message-ID <[email protected]>
Hi Al,

Concerning the several comments in the area of Measurement units, I am unsure what is intended for some of these.  One example below:

   - Shaper Rate (SR): the Shaper Rate is only applicable to the  traffic shaping tests.  The SR represents the average egress output rate (bps) over the test interval.

ACM] determine and add: 
Measurement Units for reported values.

In this example, the SR is bps, so sorry I must be missing something obvious concerning your request.

Thanks,
Barry

________________________________________
From: bmwg [[email protected]] on behalf of MORTON, ALFRED C (AL) [[email protected]]
Sent: Monday, January 05, 2015 2:10 PM
To: [email protected]; [email protected]
Subject: Re: [bmwg] Second WGLC on draft-ietf-bmwg-traffic-management

BMWG -FYI this WGLC ends tomorrow.

Hi Barry and Ramki,

These are my comments on
                      Traffic Management Benchmarking
                      draft-ietf-bmwg-traffic-management-01.txt

Al
(as participant)

Note: as Document Shepherd, I see quite a few nits generated
by the nits-checker:
https://tools.ietf.org/idnits?url=https://tools.ietf.org/id/draft-ietf-bmwg-traffic-management-01.txt


High-level:
   7. Security Considerations

   8. IANA Considerations

   9. Conclusions

Security and IANA sections are Mandatory, and cannot be blank.

I saw a few "TBD" in section 6, questions for Ramki. . .

The new procedures add considerable needed details, but also
raise a few questions.

When considering repeatability over multiple test runs, there could
be a statistical measure of deviation for the key benchmarks so that
the audience can easily assess the degree of consistency observed.

Detailed comments on a partial version of the draft are attached.

________________________________________
From: bmwg [[email protected]] On Behalf Of MORTON, ALFRED C (AL)
Sent: Wednesday, December 10, 2014 2:30 PM
To: [email protected]; [email protected]
Subject: [bmwg] Second WGLC on draft-ietf-bmwg-traffic-management

BMWG (and AQM):

A WG Last Call period for the Internet-Draft on
Traffic Management Benchmarking:

   http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-bmwg-traffic-management

will be open from 10 December 2014 through 6 January, 2015.

The first WGLC (on -00) closed October 21 2014, with substantial
comments and the authors believe they are now addressed.

This draft is continuing the BMWG Last Call Process. See
http://www1.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/bmwg/current/msg00846.html

Please read and express your opinion on whether or not this
Internet-Draft should be forwarded to the Area Directors for
publication as an Informational RFC.  Send your comments
to this list or [email protected] and [email protected]

Al
bmwg co-chair


_______________________________________________
bmwg mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/bmwg
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.