Re: First WGLC on draft-banks-bmwg-issu-meth

Hi David,

You're right, in this case
ACM:
suggest:
...this methodology (using realistic configuration) is advised...

we can just say deployment instead:
ACM:
suggest:
...this methodology (using production configuration) is advised...

-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-

Same for this one:
ACM:
You've pointed out lots of shortcomings above, so suggest: 
...this approach, so comparison with at least one realistic configuration
is RECOMMENDED.

revised as 
ACM:
You've pointed out lots of shortcomings above, so suggest: 
...this approach, so comparison with at least one production configuration
is RECOMMENDED.

thanks and regards,
Al


> -----Original Message-----
> From: bmwg [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of David Newman
> Sent: Monday, March 02, 2015 3:19 PM
> To: [email protected]
> Subject: Re: [bmwg] First WGLC on draft-banks-bmwg-issu-meth
> 
> Hi Al,
> 
> Your comments on this draft twice suggest using the word "realistic,"
> the definition of which has historically been a bmwg non-objective.
> Scott Bradner's "real for whom?" question applies here.
> 
> The ID authors avoid the term, instead referring to production
> environments as opposed to lab settings. I think that's a wise
> distinction, as it avoids the rathole of what "real" means.
> 
> dn
> 
> 
> On 2/28/15 12:45 PM, MORTON, ALFRED C (AL) wrote:
> > ISSU Authors,
> >
> > You should be proud, this draft has made a lot of progress since we
> first
> > discussed the idea of this unusual testing.
> >
> > I made time to read the draft on a plane trip, and my comments
> > are attached.
> >
> > Al
> > (as a participant)
> >
> >> -----Original Message-----
> >> From: bmwg [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of MORTON, ALFRED C
> >> (AL)
> >> Sent: Wednesday, February 04, 2015 7:18 PM
> >> To: [email protected]
> >> Subject: [bmwg] First WGLC on draft-banks-bmwg-issu-meth
> >>
> >> BMWG:
> >>
> >> A WG Last Call period for the Internet-Draft on
> >> In Service Software Upgrade Benchmarking:
> >>
> >> https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-banks-bmwg-issu-meth-05
> >>
> >> will be open from 4 February 2015 through 5 March 2015.
> >>
> >> Please note that this draft *has* been adopted by the working group
> >> as indicated in our minutes from IETF-91:
> >> http://www.ietf.org/proceedings/91/minutes/minutes-91-bmwg
> >> The filename has not been modified yet, but let's not stand on ceremony
> >> and complete the technical review instead. The next revision will fix
> >> names.
> >>
> >> This draft is beginning the BMWG Last Call Process. See
> >> http://www1.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/bmwg/current/msg00846.html
> >>
> >> Please read and express your opinion on whether or not this
> >> Internet-Draft should be forwarded to the Area Directors for
> >> publication as an Informational RFC.  Send your comments
> >> to this list or [email protected]
> >>
> >> Al
> >> bmwg co-chair
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> _______________________________________________
> >> bmwg mailing list
> >> [email protected]
> >> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/bmwg
> >>
> >>
> >> _______________________________________________
> >> bmwg mailing list
> >> [email protected]
> >> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/bmwg
> 
> _______________________________________________
> bmwg mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/bmwg