Re: draft-cerveny-bmwg-ipv6-nd
Marius Georgescu <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.ietf.bmwg |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
I think this draft is a very good initiative and I support its adoption. I also have a question/comment. I understand that the draft is targeting the ND resilience problems described by RFC6583. However, I was wondering if it wouldn’t be beneficial to add benchmarking tests that can cover the performance of some other functions of ND devices (as presented in RFC4861), such as: Duplicate Address Detection (may be very useful for mobile IPv6) or Neighbor Unreachability Detection. Best regards, Marius Georgescu On Mar 1, 2015, at 5:55, MORTON, ALFRED C (AL) <[email protected]> wrote: > Hi Bill and Ron, > > I made some time to read your latest update on a plane ride. > This draft seems to have a few areas for further > development, but otherwise in very good shape. > > I attach my comments, > Al > (as a participant) > > > > <draft-cerveny-bmwg-ipv6-nd-06review.txt>_______________________________________________ > bmwg mailing list > [email protected] > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/bmwg