Re: draft-cerveny-bmwg-ipv6-nd

Hi Marius,

I agree with both of you. OTOH, we should restrict the scope of the current draft. OTOH, it would be a very good idea to start a new draft to benchmark DAD and NUD.

                                                                                                                   Ron


From: Cerveny, Bill [mailto:[email protected]]
Sent: Monday, March 16, 2015 8:26 AM
To: Marius Georgescu
Cc: MORTON, ALFRED C (AL); [email protected]; [email protected]
Subject: Re: [bmwg] draft-cerveny-bmwg-ipv6-nd

Hi Marius,

Thanks for your comments. I had been reluctant to expand the scope beyond that described by RFC6583, at least partially to keep the document focused and perhaps to help expedite the document's publication.

A question I have though ... what performance benchmarks would there be for DAD or NUD? One of the challenges we've had regarding draft-cerveny-bmwg-ipv6-nd is to confirm that the tests are reporting performance and not compliance ...

Thanks,

Bill Cerveny

On Sun, Mar 15, 2015 at 11:07 PM, Marius Georgescu <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
I think this draft is a very good initiative and I support its adoption. I also have a question/comment.

I understand that the draft is targeting the ND resilience problems described by RFC6583. However, I was wondering if it wouldn’t be beneficial to add benchmarking tests that can cover the performance of some other functions of ND devices (as presented in RFC4861), such as: Duplicate Address Detection (may be very useful for mobile IPv6) or Neighbor Unreachability Detection.

Best regards,
Marius Georgescu

On Mar 1, 2015, at 5:55, MORTON, ALFRED C (AL) <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:

> Hi Bill and Ron,
>
> I made some time to read your latest update on a plane ride.
> This draft seems to have a few areas for further
> development, but otherwise in very good shape.
>
> I attach my comments,
> Al
> (as a participant)
>
>
>
> <draft-cerveny-bmwg-ipv6-nd-06review.txt>_______________________________________________
> bmwg mailing list
> [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/bmwg

_______________________________________________
bmwg mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/bmwg