Re: Kathleen Moriarty's No Objection on draft-ietf-bmwg-traffic-management-04: (with COMMENT)

Thank you, Barry!

Best regards,
Kathleen 

Sent from my iPhone

> On Jun 2, 2015, at 6:52 PM, Barry Constantine <[email protected]> wrote:
> 
> Hello Kathleen,
> 
> Thank you or reviewing the draft and raising the good point for consideration of tcpcrypt.
> 
> We incorporated revisions into the new draft revision 05 which address this consideration.
> 
> Thank you,
> Barry and Ramki
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Kathleen Moriarty [mailto:[email protected]] 
> Sent: Wednesday, May 27, 2015 2:55 PM
> To: The IESG
> Cc: [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]
> Subject: Kathleen Moriarty's No Objection on draft-ietf-bmwg-traffic-management-04: (with COMMENT)
> 
> Kathleen Moriarty has entered the following ballot position for
> draft-ietf-bmwg-traffic-management-04: No Objection
> 
> When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this introductory paragraph, however.)
> 
> 
> Please refer to https://www.ietf.org/iesg/statement/discuss-criteria.html
> for more information about IESG DISCUSS and COMMENT positions.
> 
> 
> The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here:
> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-bmwg-traffic-management/
> 
> 
> 
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> COMMENT:
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> 
> Thanks for your work on this draft.  I just have one question that was raised in the SecDir review:
> 
> Was there any thought to how the tcpinc efforts might affect the ability to gather measurements?
> http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/secdir/current/msg05726.html
> 
> It doesn't have an impact on this draft yet, but could in the future.
> 
>