Re: I-D Update

Dear Al,
 
 
 
Thank
you for you draft-a-week suggestion. This
should speed-up the review process and further stimulate discussion on the ML. 
 
So, in the draft-a-week spirit, here is my review for Bill and Ron’s draft (https://tools.ietf.org/id/draft-ietf-bmwg-ipv6-nd-00.txt).

 

Section 4: Test setup

###MG: a recommended frame size/frame size interval might help

Sections 61. and 6.2:

###MG: I think a specific reporting format and a specific number of repetitions(an associated measurement error) would be beneficial.

 

Best regards,

Marius

On 07/02/15, "MORTON, ALFRED C (AL)"  <[email protected]> wrote:
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> Thanks for your efforts here, Marius!
> 
> There are several revised drafts on our pages,
> 
> and readership is a key aspect of participation.
> 
> Let’s all commit to review a draft-a-week leading
> 
> up to Prague. 
> 
>  
> 
> Also, the draft agenda is posted in the usual place.
> 
>  
> 
> regards,
> 
> Al
> 
> bmwg co-chair
> 
>  
> 
> 
> 
> 
> From: bmwg [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Marius Georgescu
> Sent: Thursday, July 02, 2015 6:37 AM
> To: [email protected]
> Subject: [bmwg] I-D Update
> 
> 
>  
> 
> Dear BMWG Members,
> 
>  
> 
> I hope my e-mail finds you well. Please find below a link to the latest update of the draft I’ve been working on:
> 
> https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-georgescu-bmwg-ipv6-tran-tech-benchmarking-01
> 
>  
> 
> The biggest change and probably the most debatable is the addition of the Delay variation (jitter) subsection under Benchmarking tests (Section 6.3), following the comments received during the IETF92 meeting. I would like to take this opportunity to thank all the people that supported and provided feedback for this draft so far and to ask for more J.
> 
>  
> 
> Best regards,
> 
> Marius 
> 
>  
> 
> 
> 
> 
>

_______________________________________________
bmwg mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/bmwg