Re: I-D Update
"GEORGESCU LIVIU MARIUS" <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.ietf.bmwg |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Dear Al, Thank you very much for the very detailed review. All the comments are relevant and I will attempt to answer them in the next version. One question though, why do you use the spelling "scaleability" ? Best regards, Marius On 07/09/15, "MORTON, ALFRED C (AL)" <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > > > > Hi Marius, > > > > Attached, please find a few suggestions for your draft. > > search for ACM: > > > > Thanks for seeking and implementing the many comments so far! > > regards, > > Al > > (as a participant) > > > > > > > From: bmwg [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Marius Georgescu > Sent: Thursday, July 02, 2015 6:37 AM > To: [email protected] > Subject: [bmwg] I-D Update > > > > > Dear BMWG Members, > > > > I hope my e-mail finds you well. Please find below a link to the latest update of the draft I’ve been working on: > > https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-georgescu-bmwg-ipv6-tran-tech-benchmarking-01 > > > > The biggest change and probably the most debatable is the addition of the Delay variation (jitter) subsection under Benchmarking tests (Section 6.3), following the comments received during the IETF92 meeting. I would like to take this opportunity to thank all the people that supported and provided feedback for this draft so far and to ask for more J. > > > > Best regards, > > Marius > > > > > > > _______________________________________________ bmwg mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/bmwg