Re: I-D Update

Hi Marius,
<participant/> Thanks for your comments!
<chair_hat/> Thanks for keeping up with *draft-a-week* reviews!
the city of 1K spires is calling,
Al

From: GEORGESCU LIVIU MARIUS [mailto:[email protected]]
Sent: Saturday, July 18, 2015 10:40 AM
To: MORTON, ALFRED C (AL); [email protected]
Subject: RE: [bmwg] I-D Update

Hello Al,

If it's just spelling, it's satisfying enough in my opinion.
I noticed you are using it in other contexts as well (e.g. VNF draft) and was wondering if it was supposed to have a different meaning than "scalability".
In the spirit of a draft-a-week, here are my comments for the draft https://www.ietf.org/id/draft-ietf-bmwg-virtual-net-00.txt.
Please find attached a txt version. I marked my comments with ###MG .

Best regards,
Marius

On 07/10/15, "MORTON, ALFRED C (AL)" <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
Hi Marius,
I typed "scaleability" late last night, and spell check didn't object, so I kept going...
simple explanation, but not satisfying,
Al
________________________________________

From: GEORGESCU LIVIU MARIUS [[email protected]]
Sent: Thursday, July 09, 2015 12:24 PM
To: MORTON, ALFRED C (AL); [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>
Subject: RE: [bmwg] I-D Update

Dear Al,

Thank you very much for the very detailed review. All the comments are relevant and I will attempt to answer them in the next version.
One question though, why do you use the spelling "scaleability" ?

Best regards,
Marius

On 07/09/15, "MORTON, ALFRED C (AL)" <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
Hi Marius,

Attached, please find a few suggestions for your draft.
search for ACM:

Thanks for seeking and implementing the many comments so far!
regards,
Al
(as a participant)

From: bmwg [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Marius Georgescu
Sent: Thursday, July 02, 2015 6:37 AM
To: [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>
Subject: [bmwg] I-D Update

Dear BMWG Members,

I hope my e-mail finds you well. Please find below a link to the latest update of the draft I’ve been working on:
https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-georgescu-bmwg-ipv6-tran-tech-benchmarking-01

The biggest change and probably the most debatable is the addition of the Delay variation (jitter) subsection under Benchmarking tests (Section 6.3), following the comments received during the IETF92 meeting.  I would like to take this opportunity to thank all the people that supported and provided feedback for this draft so far and to ask for more ☺.

Best regards,
Marius

_______________________________________________
bmwg mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/bmwg