Re: WG ADOPTION: draft-bhuvan-bmwg-of-controller-benchmarking (terms and meth)

Barry Constantine <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.ietf.bmwg
Message-ID <[email protected]>
Hi BMWG,

I have read this document and fully support this work.

I don't have any specific comments to the draft text, but a general comment that is applicable to most all BMWG works.

It would be great to see this draft "verified" in lab based tests (incrementally of course) so that the testing method and results can be shared with the BMWG (which would help to demonstrate the value).

Thank you,
Barry Constantine

Viavi Solutions
Principal Member Technical Staff
301-325-7069

-----Original Message-----
From: bmwg [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of MORTON, ALFRED C (AL)
Sent: Tuesday, September 22, 2015 4:08 PM
To: [email protected]
Subject: [bmwg] WG ADOPTION: draft-bhuvan-bmwg-of-controller-benchmarking (terms and meth)

BMWG,

According to our minutes of IETF-93:
https://www.ietf.org/proceedings/93/minutes/minutes-93-bmwg

those present expressed support to adopt:

Benchmarking Terminology and Methodology for SDN Controller Performance	
http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-bhuvan-bmwg-sdn-controller-benchmark-term-00
http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-bhuvan-bmwg-of-controller-benchmarking-01

as a chartered work item.

We now seek to confirm that support on the mailing list.

Please reply with your opinion whether the BMWG should adopt these drafts, whether you have read the drafts, and any comments on the drafts or this call for adoption.

Deadline: October 13, 2015

thanks for your attention,
Al
bmwg co-chair

_______________________________________________
bmwg mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/bmwg
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.