Re: WG ADOPTION: draft-georgescu-bmwg-ipv6-tran-tech-benchmarking

<[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.ietf.bmwg
Message-ID <[email protected]>
Marius,
Sure.   I suppose if you include SONET, then that begs the question why not all the other media types as well.
I agree with stopping at Ethernet. Thanks,
Nalini ElkinsInside Products, Inc.   www.insidethestack.com(831) 659-8360
      From: GEORGESCU LIVIU MARIUS <[email protected]>
 To: [email protected]; "[email protected]" <[email protected]> 
 Sent: Wednesday, September 23, 2015 8:06 AM
 Subject: Re: [bmwg] WG ADOPTION: draft-georgescu-bmwg-ipv6-tran-tech-benchmarking
   
Hello Nalini,
Thank you very much for your support and feedback.You are correct, in my understanding, jumbo frames could be tested over SONET as well. However, some comments I've received from Al and Fred Baker made me think it might be better to stop the recommendations at Ethernet (as example media).Of course, if there are comments  in support of keeping SONET recommendations in the draft, I will reconsider.
Best regards,Marius  

On 09/23/15, [email protected] wrote:

| BMWG,
I have read this draft and I support it.  I believe that it discusses an area which is quite important in this era of transition from IPv4 to IPv6.
One comment that I have:
Section 4.1.2  Frame Sizes to be Used Over SONET
I thought that jumbo frames (9180) were supported over SONET.   Is that not correct?
Thanks,
Nalini ElkinsInside Products, Inc.www.insidethestack.com(831) 659-8360
      From: "MORTON, ALFRED C (AL)" <[email protected]>
 To: "[email protected]" <[email protected]> 
 Sent: Tuesday, September 22, 2015 1:08 PM
 Subject: [bmwg] WG ADOPTION: draft-georgescu-bmwg-ipv6-tran-tech-benchmarking
   
BMWG,

According to our minutes of IETF-93:
https://www.ietf.org/proceedings/93/minutes/minutes-93-bmwg

those present expressed strong support to adopt:
IPv6 Transition Benchmarking
http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-georgescu-bmwg-ipv6-tran-tech-benchmarking-01

as a chartered work item.

The Co-Chairs now seek to confirm that support on the mailing list.

Please reply with your opinion whether the BMWG should adopt
this draft, whether you have read the draft, and any comments
on the draft or this call for adoption.

Deadline: October 13, 2015

thanks for your attention,
Al
bmwg co-chair

_______________________________________________
bmwg mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/bmwg


    |

_______________________________________________
bmwg mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/bmwg
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.