Re: WG ADOPTION: draft-bhuvan-bmwg-of-controller-benchmarking (terms and meth)

Hi Jacob, Thanks for your comment.

There may be a way to resolve your comment through better definitions.
However, when the draft was first introduced, one of my comments
(with which several people agreed) was to avoid making this 
Openflow-specific.  

We could say, "For the purposes of this memo,
SDN Controller is defined as..."
or
We could choose some name more specific to the role the 
controller performs "...in SDN"

I'll re-post part of the thread I'm referring to.

regards,
Al
(as a participant)

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Jacob Rapp [mailto:[email protected]]
> Sent: Monday, October 12, 2015 10:28 AM
> To: MORTON, ALFRED C (AL); [email protected]
> Subject: Re: [bmwg] WG ADOPTION: draft-bhuvan-bmwg-of-controller-
> benchmarking (terms and meth)
> 
> As I mentioned during the meetings, I still do not agree with the use of
> “SDN Controller” here. SDN is a broad term and the drafts seem to be
> focused on OpenFlow controllers. If there is a more concise definition,
> why not use it (OpenFlow vs. SDN)?
> 
> —
> Jacob
> 
> 
> 
> On 9/22/15, 10:08 PM, "bmwg on behalf of MORTON, ALFRED C (AL)" <bmwg-
> [email protected] on behalf of [email protected]> wrote:
> 
> >BMWG,
> >
> >According to our minutes of IETF-93:
> >https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__www.ietf.org_proce
> >edings_93_minutes_minutes-2D93-2Dbmwg&d=BQICAg&c=Sqcl0Ez6M0X8aeM67LKIiD
> >JAXVeAw-YihVMNtXt-uEs&r=4eVZvh2C5Un5N5XXv1rh7g&m=3oSHyL4yf3qce7gHDk6RRc
> >FlnDn0fE7E4x4ZrAE4ciU&s=yHLFC_S7xKVwxUTrxkgAO2Wv6TERINPx3asK-NV5mes&e=
> >
> >those present expressed support to adopt:
> >
> >Benchmarking Terminology and Methodology for SDN Controller Performance
> 
> >https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=http-3A__tools.ietf.org_html
> >_draft-2Dbhuvan-2Dbmwg-2Dsdn-2Dcontroller-2Dbenchmark-2Dterm-2D00&d=BQI
> >CAg&c=Sqcl0Ez6M0X8aeM67LKIiDJAXVeAw-YihVMNtXt-uEs&r=4eVZvh2C5Un5N5XXv1r
> >h7g&m=3oSHyL4yf3qce7gHDk6RRcFlnDn0fE7E4x4ZrAE4ciU&s=rNtr6etgVTlWeAJHy53
> >26lR9hl3-6rAyfu95MVs8UPI&e=
> >https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=http-3A__tools.ietf.org_html
> >_draft-2Dbhuvan-2Dbmwg-2Dof-2Dcontroller-2Dbenchmarking-2D01&d=BQICAg&c
> >=Sqcl0Ez6M0X8aeM67LKIiDJAXVeAw-YihVMNtXt-uEs&r=4eVZvh2C5Un5N5XXv1rh7g&m
> >=3oSHyL4yf3qce7gHDk6RRcFlnDn0fE7E4x4ZrAE4ciU&s=4Xz1K2D3X45eEIjJF3HXEGwL
> >lR2UB8-mrrWG8dsdA7k&e=
> >
> >as a chartered work item.
> >
> >We now seek to confirm that support on the mailing list.
> >
> >Please reply with your opinion whether the BMWG should adopt these
> >drafts, whether you have read the drafts, and any comments on the
> >drafts or this call for adoption.
> >
> >Deadline: October 13, 2015
> >
> >thanks for your attention,
> >Al
> >bmwg co-chair
> >
> >_______________________________________________
> >bmwg mailing list
> >[email protected]
> >https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__www.ietf.org_mailm
> >an_listinfo_bmwg&d=BQICAg&c=Sqcl0Ez6M0X8aeM67LKIiDJAXVeAw-YihVMNtXt-
> uEs&r=4eVZvh2C5Un5N5XXv1rh7g&m=3oSHyL4yf3qce7gHDk6RRcFlnDn0fE7E4x4ZrAE4c
> iU&s=-3y2976SCSn9LYAEU6lrZ_ZMDeocMmZ3ByRSBw5qFSw&e=
_______________________________________________
bmwg mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/bmwg