Re: WG ADOPTION: draft-bhuvan-bmwg-of-controller-benchmarking (terms and meth)

Vishwas Manral <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.ietf.bmwg
Message-ID <CAOyVPHQCZEyx5oZey8aXvQUoyi8xkqTzK=RQnMNfLq2TH3rOcA@mail.gmail.com>
Al,

I support the effort.

Jacob, I think we may need to further sharpen the term SDN Controller - I
however agree with Al we don't want to be focused on OF only

Thanks,
Vishwas
On Oct 12, 2015 7:29 AM, "Jacob Rapp" <[email protected]> wrote:

> As I mentioned during the meetings, I still do not agree with the use of
> “SDN Controller” here. SDN is a broad term and the drafts seem to be
> focused on OpenFlow controllers. If there is a more concise definition, why
> not use it (OpenFlow vs. SDN)?
>
> —
> Jacob
>
>
>
> On 9/22/15, 10:08 PM, "bmwg on behalf of MORTON, ALFRED C (AL)" <
> [email protected] on behalf of [email protected]> wrote:
>
> >BMWG,
> >
> >According to our minutes of IETF-93:
> >
> https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__www.ietf.org_proceedings_93_minutes_minutes-2D93-2Dbmwg&d=BQICAg&c=Sqcl0Ez6M0X8aeM67LKIiDJAXVeAw-YihVMNtXt-uEs&r=4eVZvh2C5Un5N5XXv1rh7g&m=3oSHyL4yf3qce7gHDk6RRcFlnDn0fE7E4x4ZrAE4ciU&s=yHLFC_S7xKVwxUTrxkgAO2Wv6TERINPx3asK-NV5mes&e=
> >
> >those present expressed support to adopt:
> >
> >Benchmarking Terminology and Methodology for SDN Controller Performance
> >
> https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=http-3A__tools.ietf.org_html_draft-2Dbhuvan-2Dbmwg-2Dsdn-2Dcontroller-2Dbenchmark-2Dterm-2D00&d=BQICAg&c=Sqcl0Ez6M0X8aeM67LKIiDJAXVeAw-YihVMNtXt-uEs&r=4eVZvh2C5Un5N5XXv1rh7g&m=3oSHyL4yf3qce7gHDk6RRcFlnDn0fE7E4x4ZrAE4ciU&s=rNtr6etgVTlWeAJHy5326lR9hl3-6rAyfu95MVs8UPI&e=
> >
> https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=http-3A__tools.ietf.org_html_draft-2Dbhuvan-2Dbmwg-2Dof-2Dcontroller-2Dbenchmarking-2D01&d=BQICAg&c=Sqcl0Ez6M0X8aeM67LKIiDJAXVeAw-YihVMNtXt-uEs&r=4eVZvh2C5Un5N5XXv1rh7g&m=3oSHyL4yf3qce7gHDk6RRcFlnDn0fE7E4x4ZrAE4ciU&s=4Xz1K2D3X45eEIjJF3HXEGwLlR2UB8-mrrWG8dsdA7k&e=
> >
> >as a chartered work item.
> >
> >We now seek to confirm that support on the mailing list.
> >
> >Please reply with your opinion whether the BMWG should adopt
> >these drafts, whether you have read the drafts, and any comments
> >on the drafts or this call for adoption.
> >
> >Deadline: October 13, 2015
> >
> >thanks for your attention,
> >Al
> >bmwg co-chair
> >
> >_______________________________________________
> >bmwg mailing list
> >[email protected]
> >
> https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__www.ietf.org_mailman_listinfo_bmwg&d=BQICAg&c=Sqcl0Ez6M0X8aeM67LKIiDJAXVeAw-YihVMNtXt-uEs&r=4eVZvh2C5Un5N5XXv1rh7g&m=3oSHyL4yf3qce7gHDk6RRcFlnDn0fE7E4x4ZrAE4ciU&s=-3y2976SCSn9LYAEU6lrZ_ZMDeocMmZ3ByRSBw5qFSw&e=
> _______________________________________________
> bmwg mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/bmwg
>

_______________________________________________
bmwg mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/bmwg
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.