Re: WG ADOPTION: draft-bhuvan-bmwg-of-controller-benchmarking (terms and meth)
Vishwas Manral <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.ietf.bmwg |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <CAOyVPHQCZEyx5oZey8aXvQUoyi8xkqTzK=RQnMNfLq2TH3rOcA@mail.gmail.com> |
Al, I support the effort. Jacob, I think we may need to further sharpen the term SDN Controller - I however agree with Al we don't want to be focused on OF only Thanks, Vishwas On Oct 12, 2015 7:29 AM, "Jacob Rapp" <[email protected]> wrote: > As I mentioned during the meetings, I still do not agree with the use of > “SDN Controller” here. SDN is a broad term and the drafts seem to be > focused on OpenFlow controllers. If there is a more concise definition, why > not use it (OpenFlow vs. SDN)? > > — > Jacob > > > > On 9/22/15, 10:08 PM, "bmwg on behalf of MORTON, ALFRED C (AL)" < > [email protected] on behalf of [email protected]> wrote: > > >BMWG, > > > >According to our minutes of IETF-93: > > > https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__www.ietf.org_proceedings_93_minutes_minutes-2D93-2Dbmwg&d=BQICAg&c=Sqcl0Ez6M0X8aeM67LKIiDJAXVeAw-YihVMNtXt-uEs&r=4eVZvh2C5Un5N5XXv1rh7g&m=3oSHyL4yf3qce7gHDk6RRcFlnDn0fE7E4x4ZrAE4ciU&s=yHLFC_S7xKVwxUTrxkgAO2Wv6TERINPx3asK-NV5mes&e= > > > >those present expressed support to adopt: > > > >Benchmarking Terminology and Methodology for SDN Controller Performance > > > https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=http-3A__tools.ietf.org_html_draft-2Dbhuvan-2Dbmwg-2Dsdn-2Dcontroller-2Dbenchmark-2Dterm-2D00&d=BQICAg&c=Sqcl0Ez6M0X8aeM67LKIiDJAXVeAw-YihVMNtXt-uEs&r=4eVZvh2C5Un5N5XXv1rh7g&m=3oSHyL4yf3qce7gHDk6RRcFlnDn0fE7E4x4ZrAE4ciU&s=rNtr6etgVTlWeAJHy5326lR9hl3-6rAyfu95MVs8UPI&e= > > > https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=http-3A__tools.ietf.org_html_draft-2Dbhuvan-2Dbmwg-2Dof-2Dcontroller-2Dbenchmarking-2D01&d=BQICAg&c=Sqcl0Ez6M0X8aeM67LKIiDJAXVeAw-YihVMNtXt-uEs&r=4eVZvh2C5Un5N5XXv1rh7g&m=3oSHyL4yf3qce7gHDk6RRcFlnDn0fE7E4x4ZrAE4ciU&s=4Xz1K2D3X45eEIjJF3HXEGwLlR2UB8-mrrWG8dsdA7k&e= > > > >as a chartered work item. > > > >We now seek to confirm that support on the mailing list. > > > >Please reply with your opinion whether the BMWG should adopt > >these drafts, whether you have read the drafts, and any comments > >on the drafts or this call for adoption. > > > >Deadline: October 13, 2015 > > > >thanks for your attention, > >Al > >bmwg co-chair > > > >_______________________________________________ > >bmwg mailing list > >[email protected] > > > https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__www.ietf.org_mailman_listinfo_bmwg&d=BQICAg&c=Sqcl0Ez6M0X8aeM67LKIiDJAXVeAw-YihVMNtXt-uEs&r=4eVZvh2C5Un5N5XXv1rh7g&m=3oSHyL4yf3qce7gHDk6RRcFlnDn0fE7E4x4ZrAE4ciU&s=-3y2976SCSn9LYAEU6lrZ_ZMDeocMmZ3ByRSBw5qFSw&e= > _______________________________________________ > bmwg mailing list > [email protected] > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/bmwg > _______________________________________________ bmwg mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/bmwg