Re: IETF-96 session: Agenda requests and Remote Participation

Al,

Thanks for feedback, good suggestions, will ensure to include all of them. 
Will add challenges with measurement tools, and how we’re going about it too.
(read: developing our own a.o.).

-Maciek

> On 13 Jul 2016, at 20:18, MORTON, ALFRED C (AL) <[email protected]> wrote:
> 
> Hi Maciek,
> 
> This is an interesting proposal, so I'd like to make a few
> suggestions to focus on what would be most relevant to BMWG
> as we develop new / revise our RFCs to more accurately measure
> virtual internetworking functions:
> 
> Procedures you and your team used when measuring classic
> benchmarks like Throughput and Latency: what measurement problems
> did you encounter and how did you resolve them?
> What did you try that didn't work?
> 
> What new black-box benchmarks and other metrics did you find
> to be relevant, and why?
> 
> If you give us a brief background on CSIT 
> (Continuous System Integration and Testing) in FD.io
> and try to answer the questions above, your presentation
> would be well-worth our meeting time (and introduce you
> to many participants who can pursue more details with
> you after our session).
> 
> BMWG: any other questions, comments, agenda bashes?
> 
> More info on the project here:
> https://wiki.fd.io/view/CSIT
> 
> Al
> bmwg co-chair
> 
> 
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: Maciek Konstantynowicz (mkonstan) [mailto:[email protected]]
>> Sent: Wednesday, July 13, 2016 12:31 PM
>> To: MORTON, ALFRED C (AL)
>> Cc: [email protected]; [email protected]
>> Subject: Re: [bmwg] IETF-96 session: Agenda requests and Remote
>> Participation
>> 
>> Al et al,
>> 
>> I know I’m late with a request for a short slot in bmwg meeting next
>> week, but I give it a go anyways just in case :)
>> 
>> I would like to ask for a 10min slot to provide an overview of the work
>> done in the Linux Foundation collaborative project FD.io CSIT.
>> 
>> We have been alive in the open-source for quite a few months now, got
>> our hands “dirty” and “bruised" with cutting edge virtual networking
>> tech (aka NFV) - pun intended :)
>> We now have first LF FD.io CSIT fully-automated func and perf
>> benchmarking report published for vpp-1606 - with all tests are executed
>> within Linux Foundation infra.
>> https://wiki.fd.io/view/CSIT/VPP-16.06_Test_Report
>> 
>> Abstract: I would like to cover a summary of the good, the bad and the
>> ugly, of squeezing "the last juice out of computers" for forwarding and
>> processing packets.
>> "the last juice out of computers” =
>>    cpu core cycles-per-packet - aka CPP (experience and examples on
>> x86_64 microarchitecture)
>>    instructions-per-packet - aka IPP
>>    instructions-per-cycle - aka IPC
>> 
>> Pls let me know what’s possible.
>> 
>> -Maciek
>> 
>> FD.io CSIT Tech Project Lead hat on
>> https://wiki.fd.io/view/CSIT
>> 
>>> On 11 Jul 2016, at 17:58, MORTON, ALFRED C (AL) <[email protected]>
>> wrote:
>>> 
>>> BMWG,
>>> The first draft agenda is uploaded:
>>> https://www.ietf.org/proceedings/96/agenda/agenda-96-bmwg
>>> 
>>> contact me with any changes or omissions,
>>> Al
>>> bmwg co-chair
>>> 
>>> 
>>>> -----Original Message-----
>>>> From: bmwg [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of MORTON, ALFRED
>> C
>>>> (AL)
>>>> Sent: Saturday, July 02, 2016 2:19 PM
>>>> To: [email protected]
>>>> Subject: [bmwg] IETF-96 session: Agenda requests and Remote
>>>> Participation
>>>> 
>>>> *** Security Advisory: This Message Originated Outside of AT&T ***.
>>>> Reference http://cso.att.com/EmailSecurity/IDSP.html for more
>>>> information.
>>>> 
>>>> BMWG,
>>>> 
>>>> Please send requests for agenda time, along with the issues
>>>> you wish to discuss and the related drafts, to the chairs:
>>>> [email protected] and [email protected]
>>>> 
>>>> IOW, if you have an issue you'd like to discuss on
>>>> *any* WG draft, this is a chance to spend some
>>>> valuable face2face time to resolve it efficiently!
>>>> 
>>>> Also, for folks participating remotely, or those who
>>>> would like to present remotely, please let us know who you
>>>> are (and other details). The WG chairs must take some
>>>> steps with our friends at Meetecho to make this possible.
>>>> 
>>>> thanks,
>>>> bmwg co-chairs
>>>> 
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> bmwg mailing list
>>>> [email protected]
>>>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/bmwg
>>> 
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> bmwg mailing list
>>> [email protected]
>>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/bmwg
> 

_______________________________________________
bmwg mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/bmwg