Re: REG: draft-jacpra-bmwg-pmtest-02
Sudhin Jacob <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.ietf.bmwg |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <BN6PR05MB296312615C117974BB68B769C2CE0@BN6PR05MB2963.namprd05.prod.outlook.com> |
Hi Lucien, As explained in the abstract of the draft this is to benchmark performance monitoring protocol as defined in Y.1731. This draft focuses just the benchmarking aspect alone where functional aspect is defined in Y.1731. Y.1731 and related documents do not explain how to benchmark these protocols. Currently different vendors/Operators using Y.1731 define their own benchmarking methodologies for the same as there is no standard available. Hope this explains your question on what is measured and the need of this draft. Kindly see more comments inline. Regards, Sudhin -----Original Message----- From: Lucien Avramov (lavramov) [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: Wednesday, September 28, 2016 11:57 PM To: Sudhin Jacob <[email protected]>; [email protected] Subject: Re: [bmwg] REG: draft-jacpra-bmwg-pmtest-02 Sudhin, I have attended the IETF meetings where you had presented the idea, and now I read the first couple of pages of this draft and to be honest, I dont understand the need of a draft that is to explain how to measure performance of a router and performance of a protocol (which protocol?). What is the purpose of this draft? What's the use case? Who's is this applicable for? How is it measured today? What does this draft brings as a benefit? Sudhin>> This is explained clearly in abstract and in the introduction of the draft. Please refer the below link to understand the functional aspect of the standard and its application. https://www.itu.int/rec/T-REC-G.8013-201508-I/en This to me seems in its infancy. Sudhin>> Hope the above explanation clarifies your questions. Please read and review the draft with these aspects in mind and help to proceed the draft to reach stable platform. Cheers, Lucien On 9/27/16 9:03 PM, Sudhin Jacob wrote: > Hi All, > We have submitted the latest revision of the draft based on the > comments received. We humbly request your support for this draft. > Regards, > Sudhin > > > _______________________________________________ > bmwg mailing list > [email protected] > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/bmwg >