Re: REG: draft-jacpra-bmwg-pmtest-02

joel jaeggli <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.ietf.bmwg
Message-ID <[email protected]>
On 10/2/16 1:04 PM, MORTON, ALFRED C (AL) wrote:
> BMWG,
> 
>  
> 
> In the last week, we have seen eight single-line messages
> 
> of support for the subject memo: draft-jacpra-bmwg-pmtest-02.
> 
>  
> 
> In the same week, the WG chairs have seen an equal number
> 
> of new subscriptions to the BMWG mailing list, with high
> 
> correlation to the messages of support.
> 
> To those who subscribed, Welcome to BMWG.
> 
>  
> 
> The WG chairs have not asked the BMWG whether we should
> 
> adopt this draft (or any other draft) in the last week.
> 
> The working group has many other chartered items in-progress,
> 
> and several WG Last Calls to conduct before we meet in Seoul.
> 
> Therefore, single-line messages of support are nice to hear,
> 
> but the BMWG is still at the starting point of evaluating the
> 
> technical content of the draft, and trying to determine whether
> 
> there is sufficient need in the Industry for the benchmarks
> 
> as proposed in draft-jacpra-bmwg-pmtest-02.  Comments along
> 
> these lines would be useful to the BMWG at this time.

In particlar whether there is interest / need for a standardized
approach to the bench-marking of ITU Y.1731  oam functions, and whether
that work should be done here vs in some other place where interested
parties congregate...

>  
> 
> Also, to the many new people joining BMWG list: I invite you
> 
> to introduce yourselves to all other participants. Please
> 
> tell us a bit about your testing background and interests,
> 
> what RFCs you currently use in your work, and how you would
> 
> use draft-jacpra-bmwg-pmtest-02 (specific use cases would be
> 
> helpful).

indeed.

>  
> 
> thanks and regards,
> 
> Al
> 
> bmwg co-chair
> 
>  
> 
> *From:*bmwg [mailto:[email protected]] *On Behalf Of *Fioccola Giuseppe
> *Sent:* Friday, September 30, 2016 8:27 AM
> *To:* Sudhin Jacob; [email protected]
> *Subject:* [bmwg] R: REG: draft-jacpra-bmwg-pmtest-02
> 
>  
> 
> Support this adoption
> 
>  
> 
> Giuseppe
> 
>  
> 
> *Da:*bmwg [mailto:[email protected]] *Per conto di *Sudhin Jacob
> *Inviato:* mercoledì 28 settembre 2016 06:04
> *A:* [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>
> *Oggetto:* [bmwg] REG: draft-jacpra-bmwg-pmtest-02
> 
>  
> 
> Hi All,
> 
>  
> 
> We have submitted the latest revision of the draft based on the comments
> received. We humbly request your support for this draft.
> 
>  
> 
> Regards,
> 
> Sudhin
> 
>  
> 
> Questo messaggio e i suoi allegati sono indirizzati esclusivamente alle
> persone indicate. La diffusione, copia o qualsiasi altra azione
> derivante dalla conoscenza di queste informazioni sono rigorosamente
> vietate. Qualora abbiate ricevuto questo documento per errore siete
> cortesemente pregati di darne immediata comunicazione al mittente e di
> provvedere alla sua distruzione, Grazie.
> 
> /This e-mail and any attachments// is //confidential and may contain
> privileged information intended for the addressee(s) only.
> Dissemination, copying, printing or use by anybody else is unauthorised.
> If you are not the intended recipient, please delete this message and
> any attachments and advise the sender by return e-mail, Thanks./
> 
> *rispetta l'ambienteRispetta l'ambiente. Non stampare questa mail se non
> è necessario.*
> 
>  
>

_______________________________________________
bmwg mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/bmwg
signature.asc (application/pgp-signature, 203 B)
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Comment: GPGTools - http://gpgtools.org

iEYEARECAAYFAlfx4VAACgkQ8AA1q7Z/VrJohwCfXghbolfcNsgXSqT6Vmr++Z9S
g9wAn2JoJQmmGDA0EFs+5JdV17OYKEad
=Cd2z
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.