Re: REG: draft-jacpra-bmwg-pmtest-02
joel jaeggli <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.ietf.bmwg |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On 10/2/16 1:04 PM, MORTON, ALFRED C (AL) wrote: > BMWG, > > > > In the last week, we have seen eight single-line messages > > of support for the subject memo: draft-jacpra-bmwg-pmtest-02. > > > > In the same week, the WG chairs have seen an equal number > > of new subscriptions to the BMWG mailing list, with high > > correlation to the messages of support. > > To those who subscribed, Welcome to BMWG. > > > > The WG chairs have not asked the BMWG whether we should > > adopt this draft (or any other draft) in the last week. > > The working group has many other chartered items in-progress, > > and several WG Last Calls to conduct before we meet in Seoul. > > Therefore, single-line messages of support are nice to hear, > > but the BMWG is still at the starting point of evaluating the > > technical content of the draft, and trying to determine whether > > there is sufficient need in the Industry for the benchmarks > > as proposed in draft-jacpra-bmwg-pmtest-02. Comments along > > these lines would be useful to the BMWG at this time. In particlar whether there is interest / need for a standardized approach to the bench-marking of ITU Y.1731 oam functions, and whether that work should be done here vs in some other place where interested parties congregate... > > > Also, to the many new people joining BMWG list: I invite you > > to introduce yourselves to all other participants. Please > > tell us a bit about your testing background and interests, > > what RFCs you currently use in your work, and how you would > > use draft-jacpra-bmwg-pmtest-02 (specific use cases would be > > helpful). indeed. > > > thanks and regards, > > Al > > bmwg co-chair > > > > *From:*bmwg [mailto:[email protected]] *On Behalf Of *Fioccola Giuseppe > *Sent:* Friday, September 30, 2016 8:27 AM > *To:* Sudhin Jacob; [email protected] > *Subject:* [bmwg] R: REG: draft-jacpra-bmwg-pmtest-02 > > > > Support this adoption > > > > Giuseppe > > > > *Da:*bmwg [mailto:[email protected]] *Per conto di *Sudhin Jacob > *Inviato:* mercoledì 28 settembre 2016 06:04 > *A:* [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> > *Oggetto:* [bmwg] REG: draft-jacpra-bmwg-pmtest-02 > > > > Hi All, > > > > We have submitted the latest revision of the draft based on the comments > received. We humbly request your support for this draft. > > > > Regards, > > Sudhin > > > > Questo messaggio e i suoi allegati sono indirizzati esclusivamente alle > persone indicate. La diffusione, copia o qualsiasi altra azione > derivante dalla conoscenza di queste informazioni sono rigorosamente > vietate. Qualora abbiate ricevuto questo documento per errore siete > cortesemente pregati di darne immediata comunicazione al mittente e di > provvedere alla sua distruzione, Grazie. > > /This e-mail and any attachments// is //confidential and may contain > privileged information intended for the addressee(s) only. > Dissemination, copying, printing or use by anybody else is unauthorised. > If you are not the intended recipient, please delete this message and > any attachments and advise the sender by return e-mail, Thanks./ > > *rispetta l'ambienteRispetta l'ambiente. Non stampare questa mail se non > è necessario.* > > > _______________________________________________ bmwg mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/bmwg
signature.asc
(application/pgp-signature, 203 B)
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Comment: GPGTools - http://gpgtools.org iEYEARECAAYFAlfx4VAACgkQ8AA1q7Z/VrJohwCfXghbolfcNsgXSqT6Vmr++Z9S g9wAn2JoJQmmGDA0EFs+5JdV17OYKEad =Cd2z -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----