Re: REG: draft-jacpra-bmwg-pmtest-02

> -----Original Message-----
> From: joel jaeggli [mailto:[email protected]]
> Sent: Monday, October 03, 2016 12:41 AM
...
> On 10/2/16 1:04 PM, MORTON, ALFRED C (AL) wrote:
> > BMWG,
> >
...
> > Therefore, single-line messages of support are nice to hear,
> >
> > but the BMWG is still at the starting point of evaluating the
> >
> > technical content of the draft, and trying to determine whether
> >
> > there is sufficient need in the Industry for the benchmarks
> >
> > as proposed in draft-jacpra-bmwg-pmtest-02.  Comments along
> >
> > these lines would be useful to the BMWG at this time.
> 
> In particlar whether there is interest / need for a standardized
> approach to the bench-marking of ITU Y.1731  oam functions, and whether
> that work should be done here vs in some other place where interested
> parties congregate...
> 

[ACM] Thanks for your additional clarification, Joel.
ITU-T SG15 is currently responsible for Rec Y.1731,
so we would need to liaise with SG 15, at a minimum.

Al