Re: WGLC: draft-ietf-bmwg-sdn-controller-benchmark-term-02 and meth-02
Sarah B <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.ietf.bmwg |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Hi Marius, Thanks for your review, and feedback. We are actively discussing the comment regarding average vs mean, and will review the comment for "max topology discovery time" as well, and circle back with you here on the list :) Thanks Sarah > On Nov 1, 2016, at 7:38 AM, Marius Georgescu <[email protected]> wrote: > > Hello BMWG, > > I have read both drafts and generally I find them mature enough to be forwarded to the IESG. > I also have one comment which seems still uncovered and may improve the draft further. > > #1# Is the average the most representative time in most of the measurements presented in > https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-bmwg-sdn-controller-benchmark-meth-02 <https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-bmwg-sdn-controller-benchmark-meth-02> ? > > Would it make sense to have maybe a "Maximum Topology Discovery Time" as a sort of worst case scenario? > The question can stand as well for other benchmarks. > > Best regards, > Marius Georgescu > Backbone Engineer > RCS & RDS Bucharest > http://www.rcs-rds.ro <http://www.rcs-rds.ro/> > -- > Any views or opinions presented in this email are solely those of the author > and do not necessarily represent those of the company. > Privileged/Confidential Information may be contained in this message. > If you are not the addressee indicated in this message (or responsible for delivery of the message to such person), > you may not copy or deliver this message to anyone. In such a case, you should destroy this message > and kindly notify the sender by reply e-mail > > > _______________________________________________ > bmwg mailing list > [email protected] > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/bmwg _______________________________________________ bmwg mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/bmwg