Re: WGLC: draft-ietf-bmwg-ipv6-tran-tech-benchmarking-03

HI Marius and Co-authors,

I found a few small errors in the latest draft:

Section 7.3.2., paragraph 8:
OLD:

           Dmax - the maximum IPDVin the stream

NEW:

 |         Dmax - the maximum IPDV in the stream


Section 7.7., paragraph 1:
OLD:

    Use Section 26.6 of [RFC2544] unmodified.

NEW:

 |  Use Section 4 of [RFC6201] unmodified.

and please ad the reference to 6201.

thanks,
Al
(as a participant)

> -----Original Message-----
> From: bmwg [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of MORTON, ALFRED C
> (AL)
> Sent: Thursday, December 01, 2016 4:50 PM
> To: [email protected]
> Subject: [bmwg] WGLC: draft-ietf-bmwg-ipv6-tran-tech-benchmarking-03
> 
> *** Security Advisory: This Message Originated Outside of AT&T ***.
> Reference http://cso.att.com/EmailSecurity/IDSP.html for more
> information.
> 
> BMWG:
> 
> A WG Last Call period for the Internet-Draft on
> Benchmarking Methodology for IPv6 Transition Technologies:
> 
> https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-bmwg-ipv6-tran-tech-benchmarking-
> 03
> 
> will be open from 1 through 24 December 2016.
> 
> This is the second WGLC on this draft, following the BMWG Last Call
> Process.
> See
> http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/bmwg/current/msg00846.html
> 
> Please read the draft and express your opinion on whether or not it
> should be forwarded to the Area Directors for publication as an
> Informational RFCs.  Send your comments to this list or to the
> co-chairs: [email protected] and [email protected]
> 
> for the co-chairs,
> Al
> 
> _______________________________________________
> bmwg mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/bmwg