Re: WGLC: draft-ietf-bmwg-sdn-controller-benchmark-term-02 and meth-02

Hi Marius,

Thank you for your comments and please find below our responses inline with tag [Authors].

Best Regards,
Bhuvan

----- Original Message -----
From: "Marius Georgescu" <[email protected]>
To: [email protected]
Sent: Tuesday, 1 November, 2016 09:38:34
Subject: Re: [bmwg] WGLC: draft-ietf-bmwg-sdn-controller-benchmark-term-02 and meth-02

Hello BMWG,

I have read both drafts and generally I find them mature enough to be forwarded to the IESG. 
I also have one comment which seems still uncovered and may improve the draft further. 

#1# Is the average the most representative time in most of the measurements presented in 
https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-bmwg-sdn-controller-benchmark-meth-02 ? 
[Authors] We had lot of discussion internally and we think If we run the test as many times 
as BMWG recommends, then presumably the mean and median would be close. 

Would it make sense to have maybe a "Maximum Topology Discovery Time" as a sort of worst case scenario? 
The question can stand as well for other benchmarks. 
[Authors] We think, determining the 'maximum' would be meaningful for size&rate and not sure about the time.
Please let us know if we miss something here.

Best regards, 
Marius Georgescu
Backbone Engineer
RCS & RDS Bucharest http://www.rcs-rds.ro --
Any views or opinions presented in this email are solely those of the author 
and do not necessarily represent those of the company.
Privileged/Confidential Information may be contained in this message. 
If you are not the addressee indicated in this message (or responsible for delivery of the message to such person),
you may not copy or deliver this message to anyone. In such a case, you should destroy this message 
and kindly notify the sender by reply e-mail 

_______________________________________________
bmwg mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/bmwg