Suresh Krishnan's No Objection on draft-ietf-bmwg-ipv6-nd-04: (with COMMENT)
"Suresh Krishnan" <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.ietf.bmwg |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Suresh Krishnan has entered the following ballot position for draft-ietf-bmwg-ipv6-nd-04: No Objection When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this introductory paragraph, however.) Please refer to https://www.ietf.org/iesg/statement/discuss-criteria.html for more information about IESG DISCUSS and COMMENT positions. The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-bmwg-ipv6-nd/ ---------------------------------------------------------------------- COMMENT: ---------------------------------------------------------------------- * Section 2 What does this mean in real life? "Furthermore, Link A and Link B must be lossless." * Section 2.1.2 The Router advertisements need to contain some values in the M and O bits. I think the values for these bits need to be specified in this section. * Section 2.2.5 Why does the tester have counters for RS packets received and RA packets sent? It is unclear why this would be useful as both should always be zero.