Alvaro Retana's Abstain on draft-ietf-bmwg-vswitch-opnfv-03: (with COMMENT)

Alvaro Retana <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.ietf.bmwg
Message-ID <[email protected]>
Alvaro Retana has entered the following ballot position for
draft-ietf-bmwg-vswitch-opnfv-03: Abstain

When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all
email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this
introductory paragraph, however.)


Please refer to https://www.ietf.org/iesg/statement/discuss-criteria.html
for more information about IESG DISCUSS and COMMENT positions.


The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here:
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-bmwg-vswitch-opnfv/



----------------------------------------------------------------------
COMMENT:
----------------------------------------------------------------------

I don't see the value of publishing this document as an RFC, specially because
it reflects the progress of the VSPERF project "through the Brahmaputra
(second) release" -- which would make this document obsolete instantly since
the project is already working on their Danube (fourth) release.  I appreciate
the fact that the WG has found the discussions around this document useful and
that the methodologies created are being referenced elsewhere.

Because the WG/Chairs/Responsible AD find value in publication I am not going
to stand in the way; I am then ABSTAINing.
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.