Adam Roach's No Objection on draft-ietf-bmwg-ipv6-tran-tech-benchmarking-07: (with COMMENT)

Adam Roach <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.ietf.bmwg
Message-ID <[email protected]>
Adam Roach has entered the following ballot position for
draft-ietf-bmwg-ipv6-tran-tech-benchmarking-07: No Objection

When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all
email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this
introductory paragraph, however.)


Please refer to https://www.ietf.org/iesg/statement/discuss-criteria.html
for more information about IESG DISCUSS and COMMENT positions.


The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here:
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-bmwg-ipv6-tran-tech-benchmarking/



----------------------------------------------------------------------
COMMENT:
----------------------------------------------------------------------

I was surprised not to find any mention of RFC 4380 (Teredo) in this document.
If its omission was intentional, a statement to that effect (say, in the
introduction) is probably warranted.
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.