Adam Roach's No Objection on draft-ietf-bmwg-ipv6-tran-tech-benchmarking-07: (with COMMENT)
Adam Roach <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.ietf.bmwg |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Adam Roach has entered the following ballot position for draft-ietf-bmwg-ipv6-tran-tech-benchmarking-07: No Objection When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this introductory paragraph, however.) Please refer to https://www.ietf.org/iesg/statement/discuss-criteria.html for more information about IESG DISCUSS and COMMENT positions. The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-bmwg-ipv6-tran-tech-benchmarking/ ---------------------------------------------------------------------- COMMENT: ---------------------------------------------------------------------- I was surprised not to find any mention of RFC 4380 (Teredo) in this document. If its omission was intentional, a statement to that effect (say, in the introduction) is probably warranted.