Terry Manderson's Abstain on draft-ietf-bmwg-vswitch-opnfv-03: (with COMMENT)
Terry Manderson <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.ietf.bmwg |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Terry Manderson has entered the following ballot position for draft-ietf-bmwg-vswitch-opnfv-03: Abstain When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this introductory paragraph, however.) Please refer to https://www.ietf.org/iesg/statement/discuss-criteria.html for more information about IESG DISCUSS and COMMENT positions. The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-bmwg-vswitch-opnfv/ ---------------------------------------------------------------------- COMMENT: ---------------------------------------------------------------------- I'm not comfortable using the RFC series to describe the _progress_ of the Open Platform for NFV. This is orthogonal to the immutable nature of the RFC series as in a very short period the progress on the Open Platform for NFV will be different, and requiring a BIS or other revisions. Thus to "inform the industry of work-in-progress" (to quote the draft) is not something that I see as a part of the RFC series. I shall not stand in the way of publication and have balloted ABSTAIN. However, my advise is to seek other avenues for publication more in line with the white-paper that is draft-ietf-bmwg-vswitch-opnfv.