[ippm] Re: [savnet] Call for adoption: draft-chen-bmwg -savnet-sav-benchmarking-08 (Ends 2026-02-04)
Shenglin Jiang <jiangshl=40zgclab.edu.cn-Tr9gZwTxerDR74oF6e/[email protected]> Thu, 15 Jan 2026 13:18:07 +0800
| Newsgroups | gmane.ietf.ippm,gmane.ietf.bmwg |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Hi, I support the adoption of this draft by the BMWG. This document addresses an important and timely problem by providing a vendor- and mechanism-agnostic benchmarking methodology for SAV mechanisms, covering both intra-domain and inter-domain scenarios. I believe this work fits well within the BMWG scope and will be valuable for evaluating and comparing existing and future SAV implementations in a reproducible manner. > 2026年1月14日 18:02,Giuseppe Fioccola via Datatracker <[email protected]> 写道: > > This message starts a bmwg WG Call for Adoption of: > draft-chen-bmwg-savnet-sav-benchmarking-08 > > This Working Group Call for Adoption ends on 2026-02-04 > > Abstract: > This document defines methodologies for benchmarking the performance > of intra-domain and inter-domain source address validation (SAV) > mechanisms. SAV mechanisms are utilized to generate SAV rules to > prevent source address spoofing, and have been implemented with many > various designs in order to perform SAV in the corresponding > scenarios. This document takes the approach of considering a SAV > device to be a black box, defining the methodology in a manner that > is agnostic to the mechanisms. This document provides a method for > measuring the performance of existing and new SAV implementations. > > Please reply to this message and indicate whether or not you support adoption > of this Internet-Draft by the bmwg WG. Comments to explain your preference > are greatly appreciated. Please reply to all recipients of this message and > include this message in your response. > > Authors, and WG participants in general, are reminded of the Intellectual > Property Rights (IPR) disclosure obligations described in BCP 79 [2]. > Appropriate IPR disclosures required for full conformance with the provisions > of BCP 78 [1] and BCP 79 [2] must be filed, if you are aware of any. > Sanctions available for application to violators of IETF IPR Policy can be > found at [3]. > > Thank you. > [1] https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/bcp78/ > [2] https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/bcp79/ > [3] https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/rfc6701/ > > The IETF datatracker status page for this Internet-Draft is: > https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-chen-bmwg-savnet-sav-benchmarking/ > > There is also an HTML version available at: > https://www.ietf.org/archive/id/draft-chen-bmwg-savnet-sav-benchmarking-08.html > > A diff from the previous version is available at: > https://author-tools.ietf.org/iddiff?url2=draft-chen-bmwg-savnet-sav-benchmarking-08 > _______________________________________________ ippm mailing list -- [email protected] To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]