[ippm] Re: [savnet] Call for adoption: draft-chen-bmwg -savnet-sav-benchmarking-08 (Ends 2026-02-04)

Shenglin Jiang <jiangshl=40zgclab.edu.cn-Tr9gZwTxerDR74oF6e/[email protected]> Thu, 15 Jan 2026 13:18:07 +0800
Newsgroups gmane.ietf.ippm,gmane.ietf.bmwg
Message-ID <[email protected]>
Hi,

I support the adoption of this draft by the BMWG.

This document addresses an important and timely problem by providing a 
vendor- and mechanism-agnostic benchmarking methodology for SAV mechanisms, 
covering both intra-domain and inter-domain scenarios. 
I believe this work fits well within the BMWG scope and will be valuable for 
evaluating and comparing existing and future SAV implementations
in a reproducible manner.


> 2026年1月14日 18:02,Giuseppe Fioccola via Datatracker <[email protected]> 写道:
> 
> This message starts a bmwg WG Call for Adoption of:
> draft-chen-bmwg-savnet-sav-benchmarking-08
> 
> This Working Group Call for Adoption ends on 2026-02-04
> 
> Abstract:
>   This document defines methodologies for benchmarking the performance
>   of intra-domain and inter-domain source address validation (SAV)
>   mechanisms.  SAV mechanisms are utilized to generate SAV rules to
>   prevent source address spoofing, and have been implemented with many
>   various designs in order to perform SAV in the corresponding
>   scenarios.  This document takes the approach of considering a SAV
>   device to be a black box, defining the methodology in a manner that
>   is agnostic to the mechanisms.  This document provides a method for
>   measuring the performance of existing and new SAV implementations.
> 
> Please reply to this message and indicate whether or not you support adoption
> of this Internet-Draft by the bmwg WG. Comments to explain your preference
> are greatly appreciated. Please reply to all recipients of this message and
> include this message in your response.
> 
> Authors, and WG participants in general, are reminded of the Intellectual
> Property Rights (IPR) disclosure obligations described in BCP 79 [2].
> Appropriate IPR disclosures required for full conformance with the provisions
> of BCP 78 [1] and BCP 79 [2] must be filed, if you are aware of any.
> Sanctions available for application to violators of IETF IPR Policy can be
> found at [3].
> 
> Thank you.
> [1] https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/bcp78/
> [2] https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/bcp79/
> [3] https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/rfc6701/
> 
> The IETF datatracker status page for this Internet-Draft is:
> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-chen-bmwg-savnet-sav-benchmarking/
> 
> There is also an HTML version available at:
> https://www.ietf.org/archive/id/draft-chen-bmwg-savnet-sav-benchmarking-08.html
> 
> A diff from the previous version is available at:
> https://author-tools.ietf.org/iddiff?url2=draft-chen-bmwg-savnet-sav-benchmarking-08
> 

_______________________________________________
ippm mailing list -- [email protected]
To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]