[ippm] Re: AD Review of draft-ietf-bmwg-network-tester-cfg
Vladimir Vassilev <vladimir=40lightside-instruments.com-Tr9gZwTxerDR74oF6e/[email protected]> Wed, 29 Apr 2026 15:22:37 +0200
| Newsgroups | gmane.ietf.ippm,gmane.ietf.bmwg |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On 4/29/26 1:23 PM, Sebastian Moeller wrote: > Maybe specify the layer of the frame you are refering to, e.g. > L2-inter-frame gap for the 20 octets outside an ethernet L2 frame? We can also go the other way with gap, burst-gap and stream-gap. I would like to steer away from OSI model references (like RFC1242 and RFC2544 managed). The model is as general as specifying the generated data plane as octets part of frames and octets part of gaps. You could implement it for L1 if for whatever reason you would want to have control over the actual preamble data (where the minimum gap would be 12 or even less) , as L2 (the case of the reference / running code and the Ethernet relevant notes in the draft) where you have the Ethernet frame specific fields including FCS, and even for L3 where your minimum gap would include MAC addresses and FCS filelds. /V _______________________________________________ ippm mailing list -- [email protected] To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]