Re: I-D ACTION:draft-ietf-bridge-8021x-03.txt

"C. M. Heard" <[email protected]> Sat, 13 Sep 2003 05:52:12 -0700 (PDT)
Newsgroups gmane.ietf.bridge
Message-ID <[email protected]>
On Tue, 9 Sep 2003, C. M. Heard wrote:
> 7.) Eliminate [RFC1213] and [RFC2863] from the list of informative
> references, since they are normative.  Use [RFC2665] in place of
> [RFC1284] [RFC1369] [RFC1398] [RFC1643] [RFC1650].  Remove [RFC2119]
> since you don't cite it or use the keywords it defines (if you did
> it would have to be a normative reference).  And if you agree to use
> the new boilerplate as suggested in #1 above, all the rest can be
> replaced by [RFC3410].  Summary:
> 
>  [RFC3411] --> assumes that you use new boilerplate

That's a typo, it should say [RFC3410].  The correct summary is:

  [RFC3410] --> assumes that you use new boilerplate
  [RFC2665] --> in place of [RFC1284] [RFC1369] [RFC1398] [RFC1643] [RFC1650]

//cmh