Re: I-D ACTION:draft-ietf-bridge-8021x-03.txt
"C. M. Heard" <[email protected]> Sat, 13 Sep 2003 05:52:12 -0700 (PDT)
| Newsgroups | gmane.ietf.bridge |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On Tue, 9 Sep 2003, C. M. Heard wrote: > 7.) Eliminate [RFC1213] and [RFC2863] from the list of informative > references, since they are normative. Use [RFC2665] in place of > [RFC1284] [RFC1369] [RFC1398] [RFC1643] [RFC1650]. Remove [RFC2119] > since you don't cite it or use the keywords it defines (if you did > it would have to be a normative reference). And if you agree to use > the new boilerplate as suggested in #1 above, all the rest can be > replaced by [RFC3410]. Summary: > > [RFC3411] --> assumes that you use new boilerplate That's a typo, it should say [RFC3410]. The correct summary is: [RFC3410] --> assumes that you use new boilerplate [RFC2665] --> in place of [RFC1284] [RFC1369] [RFC1398] [RFC1643] [RFC1650] //cmh