FW: Please review and comment: draft-ietf-ops-vlanid-tc-mib-00.tx t

Any comments?

Thanks,
Bert 

-----Original Message-----
From: Mark Ellison [mailto:[email protected]]
Sent: woensdag 31 december 2003 20:04
To: Wijnen, Bert (Bert)
Cc: [email protected]
Subject: Re: Please review and comment:
draft-ietf-ops-vlanid-tc-mib-00.tx t


Hi Bert,

Thanks for your reply. 

I think I'd call a TC with a value range of Integer32 { 0 | 1..4094 | 
4095 }  a VlanIdReference or VlanIdAssociation.

This TC would be useful when defining an object that refers to a vlan.  
For example, a table where each entry can be associated with none, one, 
or any vlan.  One alternative, with the existing TCs, would be to use 
VlanIdOrAny, but have the agent return noSuchInstance when there is no 
association with a vlan. Another alternative, with the existing TCs, 
would be to use VlanIdOrNone, and not have use of the special any/4095 
value.

Regards,

Mark

Wijnen, Bert (Bert) wrote:

>Sorry for late reaction... but I am now again looking at 
>this document and the discussion that we had back in October.
>
>inline
>  
>
>>-----Original Message-----
>>From: Mark Ellison [mailto:[email protected]]
>>Sent: donderdag 2 oktober 2003 20:12
>>To: Wijnen, Bert (Bert)
>>Cc: Mark Ellison; [email protected]
>>Subject: Re: Please review and comment:
>>draft-ietf-ops-vlanid-tc-mib-00.txt
>>
>>
>>Hi Bert,
>>
>>I'm wondering if there could be any mib or pib definition requiring a 
>>range of ( 0 | 1..4094 | 4095 )  for possible values?
>>
>>    
>>
>Mark, I have not seen anyone react to this as a option that they
>wanted, so for now I am not going to include it.
>It can of course always be added later if a need arises.
>
>By the way, what woyuld you call/name that TC?
>
>Bert
>  
>
>>Regards,
>>
>>Mark
>>
>>
>>
>>    
>>
>
>  
>