Re: FW: Please review and comment: draft-ietf-ops-vl anid-tc-mib-00.tx t

"Randy Presuhn" <[email protected]> Thu, 26 Feb 2004 12:04:45 -0800

Newsgroups	gmane.ietf.bridge
Message-ID	<000a01c3fca3$c8151700$7f1afea9@oemcomputer>

Hi -

> From: "Wijnen, Bert (Bert)" <[email protected]>
> To: "'Juergen Schoenwaelder'" <[email protected]>; "Wijnen, Bert (Bert)" <[email protected]>
> Cc: <[email protected]>
> Sent: Sunday, February 15, 2004 3:03 PM
> Subject: RE: [Bridge-mib] FW: Please review and comment: draft-ietf-ops-vl anid-tc-mib-00.tx t
...
>        SYNTAX            Integer32 (0 | 1..4094)
>
> And then possibly do away with the VlanIdentifierOrAny?
...

This works as long as one doesn't need to be able to represent
both "none" and "any" as well as the specific VLAN numbers.
The only context I can think of where one might need both
distinct semantics would be in configuring policy-like things.

Randy