RE: Pre-last-call review
"Romascanu, Dan (Dan)" <[email protected]> Tue, 13 Apr 2004 21:24:07 +0300
| Newsgroups | gmane.ietf.bridge |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <AAB4B3D3CF0F454F98272CBE187FDE2F056B2B4A@is0004avexu1.global.avaya.com> |
> > 6) an IEEE/IETF sync review - have the IEEE > > designs changed such that these mibs are no > > longer appropriate? > > I have verified that the module matches the one > on the IEEE web site, modulo the changes put in > that were needed to make it compile. However, > the IEEE was working on an update while this > was going on. I don't know the status of tat > effort, but if the IEEE has finished that > work, then we should probably republishe the > new version, not this one. > Mike is raising a good issue. What is the point of issuing a MIB document aligned with the older version of IEEE 802.1X? The revision (D9) was in Sponsor Ballot last February, so it should not be far from approval. Regards, Dan