RE: Pre-last-call review

"Romascanu, Dan (Dan)" <[email protected]> Tue, 13 Apr 2004 21:24:07 +0300
Newsgroups gmane.ietf.bridge
Message-ID <AAB4B3D3CF0F454F98272CBE187FDE2F056B2B4A@is0004avexu1.global.avaya.com>
> > 6) an IEEE/IETF sync review - have the IEEE
> > designs changed such that these mibs are no
> > longer appropriate?
> 
> I have verified that the module matches the one
> on the IEEE web site, modulo the changes put in
> that were needed to make it compile.  However,
> the IEEE was working on an update while this
> was going on.  I don't know the status of tat
> effort, but if the IEEE has finished that
> work, then we should probably republishe the
> new version, not this one.
> 

Mike is raising a good issue. What is the point of issuing a MIB document aligned with the older version of IEEE 802.1X? The revision (D9) was in Sponsor Ballot last February, so it should not be far from approval.

Regards,

Dan