RE: dot1dStpPortPathCost32

"Romascanu, Dan \(Dan\)" <[email protected]> Tue, 2 Nov 2004 19:30:11 +0200

Newsgroups	gmane.ietf.bridge
Message-ID	<AAB4B3D3CF0F454F98272CBE187FDE2F06E30337@is0004avexu1.global.avaya.com>

Unless I am missing something, I do not see how such a change would not mandate returning to Proposed. 

Regards,

Dan



> 
> a) Formally, we are not expected (or even allowed?) to add 
> objects while
>    moving from Draft to Standard. So this needs careful consideration
>    from the IETF procedures perspective and support by the AD.
>