RE: [Bridge-mib] FW: [802.1] 802.1 PARs

My understanding from the discussions at the 802.1 Plenary session this week is that all 802.1 projects will include the definition of the management model, management objects, and an SMIv2 MIB definition wherever applicable - even if this is not explicitly mentioned in the PAR. My understanding is that all the three projects whose PARs is being discussed now will have such MIB modules defined. 

- 802.1aj may extend the 802.3ae OAM. If so, it may need at least an extension of the EFM OAM MIB defined now in hubmib. They also are talking about some kind of agent-sub-agent model, possibly using the extensions of the OAM protocol
- 802.1ak looks like will need to extend the son-of-2674 MIB for MRP operation

Regards,

Dan



> -----Original Message-----
> From: [email protected] 
> [mailto:[email protected]]On Behalf Of David B Harrington
> Sent: 18 November, 2004 7:49 PM
> To: [email protected]
> Subject: [Bridge-mib] FW: [802.1] 802.1 PARs
> 
> 
> FYI. 
> 
> There are three PARs being considered in IEEE 802.1
> The first will definitely use a MIB.
> The second will either use a MIB directly, or indirectly.
> I'm not sure if the third PAR plans to develop a MIB a not.
>  
> The appropriate mailing list for IEEE 802.1 mib module discussion is
> [email protected].
> To subscribe to the STDS-802-1-L list, go to
> http://www.ieee802.org/1/email-pages/
> To see the general information about 802,1, including how they work
> and how to participate, go to http://www.ieee802.org/1/
> To see presentations on the technology, go to
> http://www.ieee802.org/1/files/public/docs2004
>   
> 
> David Harrington
> [email protected]
> co-chair, IETF Bridge WG
>   
> ________________________________
> 
> 	From: IEEE 802.1 [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of
> Tony Jeffree
> 	Sent: Wednesday, November 17, 2004 12:44 PM
> 	To: [email protected]
> 	Subject: [802.1] 802.1 PARs
> 	
> 	
> 	I have uploaded revised versions of the 3 802.1 proposed PARs,
> with changes made in resolution of comments received. 
> 	
> 	PLEASE NOTE that in response to Pat Thaler's comment that
> accepted practice avoids the use if "i" in project numbering, the
> P802.1ai PAR has been renumbered as p802.1ak.
> 	
> 	The 5c's are unchanged, with the exception of the p802.1ai 5c
> which has been relabeled as p802.1ak.
> 	
> 	The files for the revised PARs and 5Cs are located here:
> 	
> 	
> http://www.ieee802.org/1/files/public/docs2004/802-1ah-draft-par-for-3
> 0-day-rule-revised.htm
> 	http://www.ieee802.org/1/files/public/docs2004/802-1ah-5c.pdf
> 	
> 	
> http://www.ieee802.org/1/files/public/docs2004/802-1aj-draft-par-for-3
> 0-day-rule-revised.htm
> 	
> <http://www.ieee802.org/1/files/public/docs2004/802-1aj-draft-par-for-
> 30-day-rule-revised.htm>
> http://www.ieee802.org/1/files/public/docs2004/802-1-aj-5c.pdf
> 	
> 	
> <http://www.ieee802.org/1/files/public/docs2004/802-1-aj-5c.pdf>
> http://www.ieee802.org/1/files/public/docs2004/802-1ak-draft-par-for-3
> 0-day-rule-revised.htm
> 	http://www.ieee802.org/1/files/public/docs2004/802-1ak-5c.pdf
> 	
> 	
> 
> 	Regards,
> 	Tony
> 	IEEE 802.1 list info:
> http://www.ieee802.org/1/email-pages/sjqnf904.html 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Bridge-mib mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/bridge-mib
>