Re: Re: Draft-iet-bridge-bridgemib-smiv2-09.txt

On Tue, Jan 25, 2005 at 10:02:38AM +0000, Les Bell wrote:
 
> > > (a) unexpanded acronym (PICS, in Sec. 3.1):
> > >
> > >    Transmission Priority           These objects are not required
> > >                                    as per the Pics Proforma and
> > >                                    not considered useful.
> > >
> > > If in the judgment of the editors the audience is likely to know
> > > what a PICS Proforma is and that one would be found in IEEE Std
> > > 802.1D-1998 then maybe this is OK (it was not a problem for me).
> >
> > Would be no problem to spell out Protocol Implementation Conformance
> > Statement (PICS) or to simply add a reference to 802.1D-1998 if
> > someone confirms that this document actually contains the PICS
> > referred to here. Can someone please check?
> 
> The PICS is in IEEE Std 802.1D-1998 Annex A

So then my proposed edit would be:

Transmission Priority           These objects are not required                  
                                as per the Pics Proforma contained              
				in [IEEE8021D] and not considered 
		                useful. 

/js

-- 
Juergen Schoenwaelder		    International University Bremen
<http://www.eecs.iu-bremen.de/>	    P.O. Box 750 561, 28725 Bremen, Germany