Re: Re: Draft-iet-bridge-bridgemib-smiv2-09.txt

"C. M. Heard" <[email protected]> Fri, 28 Jan 2005 09:24:51 -0800 (PST)
Newsgroups gmane.ietf.bridge
Message-ID <[email protected]>
This proposal looks good to me.  //cmh

On Fri, 28 Jan 2005, Juergen Schoenwaelder wrote:

> On Thu, Jan 27, 2005 at 08:34:14PM -0500, David B Harrington wrote:
>  
> > If, for accuracy reasons, we're going to list required objects from
> > other mib modules, then we need to be accurate.
> 
> Here is another proposal.
> 
> 3.2  Relationship to Other MIB Modules
> 
>    As described above, some IEEE 802.1D management objects have not
>    been included in this MIB module because they overlap with objects
>    in other MIB modules applicable to a bridge implementing this MIB
>    module.
> 
> 3.2.1  Relationship to the SNMPv2-MIB
> 
>    The SNMPv2-MIB [RFC3418] defines objects that are generally
>    applicable to managed devices. These objects apply to the device as
>    a whole irrespective of whether the device's sole functionality is
>    bridging, or whether bridging is only a subset of the device's
>    functionality. 
> 
>    As explained in section 3.1, full support for the 802.1D management
>    objects requires that the objects sysDescr and sysUpTime of the
>    SNMPv2-MIB [RFC3418] are implemented. Note that compliance to the
>    current SNMPv2-MIB module requires additional objects and
>    notifications to be implemented as specified in RFC 3418 [RFC3418].
> 
> 3.2.2  Relationship to the IF-MIB
> 
>    The IF-MIB [RFC2863] defines managed objects used for managing
>    network interface. A network interface is thought of as being
>    attached to a `subnetwork'. (Note that this term is not to be
>    confused with `subnet' which refers to an addressing partitioning
>    scheme used in the Internet suite of protocols.)  The term
>    'segment' is used in this memo to refer to such a subnetwork,
>    whether it be an Ethernet segment, a 'ring', a WAN link, or even an
>    X.25 virtual circuit.
> 
>    As explained in section 3.1, full support for the 802.1D management
>    objects requires that the objects ifIndex, ifType, ifDescr,
>    ifPhysAddress, and ifLastChange of the IF-MIB [RFC2863] are
>    implemented. Note that compliance to the current IF-MIB module
>    requires additional objects and notifications to be implemented as
>    specified in RFC 2863 [RFC2863].
> 
> /js
> 
> -- 
> Juergen Schoenwaelder		    International University Bremen
> <http://www.eecs.iu-bremen.de/>	    P.O. Box 750 561, 28725 Bremen, Germany
>