Re: Doubt on 802.1w (max age)
dharam <[email protected]> Thu, 22 Feb 2007 04:01:51 -0800 (PST)
| Newsgroups | gmane.ietf.bridge |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Hi There, Just wanted to check which RSTP code you are using. Is it the RSTP LIB on source forge . Was your testing successful ? Did you have to do any modifications to RSTPLIB so that it actually sends out BPDUs or it sends it out anyways. Please email your response to [email protected] pjoseph wrote: > > > Hi, > > Setup: > 6 manageable switches are connected in linear fashion with root > brdige > at top . In the root bridge ,max-age ,hellotime and forward-delay is > configured as 6 ,1 and 4 . > > > Issue : > In the sixth bridge ,learned value of max-age,hello time and forward > delay is found as 6 ,1 and 4.But the role of the port connected to > switch 6 alone is switching between F/R (Root) and F/D (Designated ) > > > > We r using the source forge rstp source code for all 6 switches > From 802.1w standard,I calculated the rcvdinfowhile timer value for > the port connected to sixth switch as 1 (Calculation done from > updtRcvdInfoWhile()) .When port of switch 6 recieves BPDU for every > hello time (1 sec) port role switches to F/R and on expiry of > rcvdInfoWhile timer expiry ( 1 sec ) port role switches to F/D . > > What do you think about it ? > > > > _______________________________________________ > Bridge-mib mailing list > [email protected] > https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/bridge-mib > > -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/Doubt-on-802.1w-%28max-age%29-tf3044617.html#a9098657 Sent from the IETF - Bridge-mib mailing list archive at Nabble.com.