Re: Does anyone still think that RECURRENCE-ID's do NOT change?

[email protected] wrote:
> 
> In any case, the intent is not germane to Dougs contention that RECURRENCE-IDs
 > change on an instance reschedule.
> 
> I agree.  By now it should be clear(er) that the iCalendar model is a 
> fixed RECURRENCE-ID model.  Lets get on to other more pressing tasks 
> before the ADs pull the plug on the WG.

I have noted that in your recent responses you fail to explain
how to change an instance without changing the pattern. Perhaps
that will clear it up. If sequence:0 has dates/times

	A
	B
	C

and SEQUENCE:1 has

	A
	B
	D

How is not not a change to the pattern?

And by the way, my email was not about 'single instance' updates.
It was about the fact that RECURENCE-IDs are not fixed forever.


-- 

  Doug Royer                     |   http://INET-Consulting.com
  -------------------------------|-----------------------------
  [email protected]                 | Office: (208)612-INET
  http://Royer.com/People/Doug   |    Fax: (866)594-8574
                                 |   Cell: (208)520-4044

                 We Do Standards - You Need Standards