Re:

[email protected] wrote:
> 
> Tim wrote on 08/27/2003 09:08:31 PM:
>  > Would someone please send me (or post) where in this discussion we've
>  > discussed the following paragraph from 3.7.1 in iTIP?
> 
> I believe that Satya recently posted a summary of that thread already. 
>  You can also check the official archives and search for the subject 
> "Recurrence ID changes?" dated 07/21/99 01:26:47 PM by Dan Hickman.
> 
> As has been previously noted and confirmed by the recent posting by 
> Derik/Frank there are some known errors in iTIP and thats one of them.  
> 
>  >                                                    but the last sentence
>  > definitely says that RECURRENCE-ID changes, and the wording and order is
>  > such that it implies that this happens for an instance change.
> 
> This last sentence is the only text in iCalendar or iTIP that says 
> RECURRENCE-ID changes.  Its contrary to the text immediately above it, 
> to the text in iCalendar and to all the logic in elsewhere in iTIP 
> describing workflow sequencing and recovery.

So do you also claim that Derik's and Frank's recient post also
is in error when it says they change? Where they in error again?


-- 

  Doug Royer                     |   http://INET-Consulting.com
  -------------------------------|-----------------------------
  [email protected]                 | Office: (208)612-INET
  http://Royer.com/People/Doug   |    Fax: (866)594-8574
                                 |   Cell: (208)520-4044

                 We Do Standards - You Need Standards