Re: ADD does not INVALIDATE current PATTERN

Doug wrote on 09/01/2003 12:17:37 PM:
> As I suspected, you did not read the email. The subject
> is 'ADD' not 'REQUEST'. Now read 'ADD':

Actually you misread what Tom wrote.  He said:

An ADD is equivalent to sending the invitee an REQUEST with a 
RECURRENCE-ID that he does not currently have. 
The invitee WOULD take CHAIRS word for RECURRENCE-ID and add it to his 
calendar, storing off RECURRENCE-ID that CHAIR supplied. 

The latter line is referring to the receiving the equivalent REQUEST with 
RECURRENCE-ID in it that the invitee does not have and thus treating it as 
an invitation to a new instance they do not currently have (Section 3.2.2 
REQUEST).  He was NOT referring to the ADD method in the second sentence.

Bruce
===========================================================================
Bruce Kahn                                INet: 
[email protected]
Messaging & Collaboration                 Phone: 978.399.6496
IBM Software Group                         FAX: and nothing but the FAX...
Standard disclaimers apply, even where prohibited by law...