Re: [Fwd: Re: CAP-12-a: Stored queries still?]

Doug Royer <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.ietf.calendar
Organization http://INET-Consulting.com
Message-ID <[email protected]>

[email protected] wrote:
> 
> Doug replied on 09/03/2003 06:07:24 PM:
>  > > We never reached a clear concensus on the issue of stored queries in
>  > > CAP.  The thread just stopped in mid-January 2003 and I still question
>  > > the usefulness of them in CAP.
>  >
>  > Is what Bruce means, it it does not end until he agrees. There was
>  > a debate - two of them over the last two years.
> 
> Check the archives and you'll see that its not only I who questioned the 
> usefulness of the feature as we have designed CAP.    Go ahead, I'll 
> wait...

That is what you said last time, so keep searching the archives for
the 1st time you brought this up.

> Recently I asked for examples of where its really useful and really has 
> benefit versus the cost and complexity to CS implementations.  Of the 2 
> people on the list who wanted to keep them (Doug & Andrea), neither 
> responded.  Why is that?

Because we had replied the previous year to your same claim. Go ahead
and search the archives... There was nothing new to reply to. Same
question, same answer.



-- 

  Doug Royer                     |   http://INET-Consulting.com
  -------------------------------|-----------------------------
  [email protected]                 | Office: (208)612-INET
  http://Royer.com/People/Doug   |    Fax: (866)594-8574
                                 |   Cell: (208)520-4044

                 We Do Standards - You Need Standards
smime.p7s (application/x-pkcs7-signature, 4.5 KB) - not displayed
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.